From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com>
To: Prathamesh Kulkarni <prathamesh.kulkarni@linaro.org>
Cc: GCC Development <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>,
Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@foss.arm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Adding a new attribute to function param to mark it as constant
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 10:59:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+=Sn1=w10D+0ak5kyabeY5xK2e63Fm_9w1sq62ESrvZApj3+Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAgBjM=L+iUgm3GaP7Ddjp4sMnN_Urai-qxBcc6tkgFapxMbuw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 3:55 AM Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
<gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Continuing from this thread,
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-July/575920.html
> The proposal is to provide a mechanism to mark a parameter in a
> function as a literal constant.
>
> Motivation:
> Consider the following intrinsic vshl_n_s32 from arrm/arm_neon.h:
>
> __extension__ extern __inline int32x2_t
> __attribute__ ((__always_inline__, __gnu_inline__, __artificial__))
> vshl_n_s32 (int32x2_t __a, const int __b)
> {
> return (int32x2_t)__builtin_neon_vshl_nv2si (__a, __b);
> }
>
> and it's caller:
>
> int32x2_t f (int32x2_t x)
> {
> return vshl_n_s32 (x, 1);
> }
Can't you do similar to what is done already in the aarch64 back-end:
#define __AARCH64_NUM_LANES(__v) (sizeof (__v) / sizeof (__v[0]))
#define __AARCH64_LANE_CHECK(__vec, __idx) \
__builtin_aarch64_im_lane_boundsi (sizeof(__vec),
sizeof(__vec[0]), __idx)
?
Yes this is about lanes but you could even add one for min/max which
is generic and such; add an argument to say the intrinsics name even.
You could do this as a non-target builtin if you want and reuse it
also for the aarch64 backend.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
>
> The constraint here is that, vshl_n<type> intrinsics require that the
> second arg (__b),
> should be an immediate value.
> Currently, this check is performed by arm_expand_builtin_args, and if
> a non-constant
> value gets passed, it emits the following diagnostic:
>
> ../armhf-build/gcc/include/arm_neon.h:4904:10: error: argument 2 must
> be a constant immediate
> 4904 | return (int32x2_t)__builtin_neon_vshl_nv2si (__a, __b);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> However, we're trying to replace builtin calls with gcc's C vector
> extensions where
> possible (PR66791), because the builtins are opaque to the optimizers.
>
> Unfortunately, we lose type checking of immediate value if we replace
> the builtin
> with << operator:
>
> __extension__ extern __inline int32x2_t
> __attribute__ ((__always_inline__, __gnu_inline__, __artificial__))
> vshl_n_s32 (int32x2_t __a, const int __b)
> {
> return __a << __b;
> }
>
> So, I was wondering if we should have an attribute for a parameter to
> specifically
> mark it as a constant value with optional range value info ?
> As Richard suggested, sth like:
> void foo(int x __attribute__((literal_constant (min_val, max_val)));
>
> Thanks,
> Prathamesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-23 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-23 10:53 Prathamesh Kulkarni
2021-07-23 17:59 ` Andrew Pinski [this message]
2021-07-26 9:04 ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2021-07-27 8:19 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-03 10:11 ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2021-08-03 10:13 ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2021-08-03 17:44 ` Martin Sebor
2021-08-04 9:46 ` Richard Earnshaw
2021-08-06 0:06 ` Martin Sebor
2021-08-06 10:51 ` Richard Earnshaw
2021-08-06 20:39 ` Martin Sebor
2021-08-12 8:32 ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2021-08-13 17:14 ` Martin Sebor
2021-08-18 6:52 ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2021-08-18 14:40 ` Martin Sebor
2021-08-19 8:10 ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2021-08-03 21:55 ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-08-04 9:50 ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2021-08-04 10:17 ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-08-04 11:50 ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2021-08-04 12:46 ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-08-04 13:00 ` Richard Earnshaw
2021-08-04 13:40 ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-08-04 14:27 ` Richard Earnshaw
2021-08-04 16:16 ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-08-04 17:08 ` Florian Weimer
2021-08-04 17:59 ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-08-05 9:32 ` Richard Earnshaw
2021-08-05 9:01 ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2021-08-05 15:06 ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-08-06 20:10 Martin Uecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+=Sn1=w10D+0ak5kyabeY5xK2e63Fm_9w1sq62ESrvZApj3+Q@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=pinskia@gmail.com \
--cc=Richard.Earnshaw@foss.arm.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=prathamesh.kulkarni@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).