* Porting to gcc 11 / intrinsics
@ 2021-08-09 17:16 NightStrike
2021-08-25 1:38 ` NightStrike
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: NightStrike @ 2021-08-09 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
When porting to GCC 11, care must be taken to adjust includes of GCC
intrinsic headers due to this change:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97148
That should be reflected in:
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-11/porting_to.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Porting to gcc 11 / intrinsics
2021-08-09 17:16 Porting to gcc 11 / intrinsics NightStrike
@ 2021-08-25 1:38 ` NightStrike
2021-08-25 2:21 ` Andrew Pinski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: NightStrike @ 2021-08-25 1:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
Should I make this a bugzilla? I guess I figured that wouldn't be
appropriate.
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021, 07:16 NightStrike <nightstrike@gmail.com> wrote:
> When porting to GCC 11, care must be taken to adjust includes of GCC
> intrinsic headers due to this change:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97148
>
> That should be reflected in:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-11/porting_to.html
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Porting to gcc 11 / intrinsics
2021-08-25 1:38 ` NightStrike
@ 2021-08-25 2:21 ` Andrew Pinski
2021-08-25 2:45 ` NightStrike
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Pinski @ 2021-08-25 2:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: NightStrike; +Cc: gcc
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 6:39 PM NightStrike via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Should I make this a bugzilla? I guess I figured that wouldn't be
> appropriate.
I don't see a reason why this should go into porting as there was no
change needed from previous versions of GCC.
Supporting -mno-sse is a new feature even.
Thanks,
Andrew
>
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2021, 07:16 NightStrike <nightstrike@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > When porting to GCC 11, care must be taken to adjust includes of GCC
> > intrinsic headers due to this change:
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97148
> >
> > That should be reflected in:
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-11/porting_to.html
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Porting to gcc 11 / intrinsics
2021-08-25 2:21 ` Andrew Pinski
@ 2021-08-25 2:45 ` NightStrike
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: NightStrike @ 2021-08-25 2:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Pinski; +Cc: gcc
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 10:21 PM Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 6:39 PM NightStrike via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 9, 2021, 07:16 NightStrike <nightstrike@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > When porting to GCC 11, care must be taken to adjust includes of GCC
> > > intrinsic headers due to this change:
> > >
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97148
> > >
> > > That should be reflected in:
> > >
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-11/porting_to.html
> > Should I make this a bugzilla? I guess I figured that wouldn't be
> > appropriate.
>
> I don't see a reason why this should go into porting as there was no
> change needed from previous versions of GCC.
> Supporting -mno-sse is a new feature even.
(Fixed my top posting gaff, sorry about that)
Ok. I would have found the information useful, perhaps another place
would be better? In general, documentation here is lacking.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-08-25 2:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-08-09 17:16 Porting to gcc 11 / intrinsics NightStrike
2021-08-25 1:38 ` NightStrike
2021-08-25 2:21 ` Andrew Pinski
2021-08-25 2:45 ` NightStrike
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).