From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25837 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2011 13:22:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 25825 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Sep 2011 13:22:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-fx0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-fx0-f47.google.com) (209.85.161.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 13:21:52 +0000 Received: by fxi1 with SMTP id 1so966887fxi.20 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 06:21:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.33.17 with SMTP id f17mr780000fad.3.1315660911495; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 06:21:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.6.196 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 06:21:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4E678A9B.3040303@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 13:22:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Comparison of GCC-4.6.1 and LLVM-2.9 on x86/x86-64 targets From: Gabriel Dos Reis To: Lawrence Crowl Cc: Vladimir Makarov , "gcc.gcc.gnu.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-09/txt/msg00104.txt.bz2 On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Lawrence Crowl wrote: > In my mind, an interesting graph would be to plot the execution > time of the benchmarks as a function of the compile time of the > benchmarks. =A0This graph would show you, in particular, what you > buy or lose by changing compilers and/or optimization/debug levels. Amen. -- Gaby