From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-179290-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28670 invoked by alias); 8 Jul 2013 05:17:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28643 invoked by uid 89); 8 Jul 2013 05:17:36 -0000
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received: from mail-ea0-f181.google.com (HELO mail-ea0-f181.google.com) (209.85.215.181)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 05:17:36 +0000
Received: by mail-ea0-f181.google.com with SMTP id a15so2684442eae.12        for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 22:17:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.14.32.197 with SMTP id o45mr23308237eea.9.1373260653873; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 22:17:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.14.98.67 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 22:17:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAH6eHdS9v+GyLvVYEjVDbuFtGxwn27-VhqEofykYMe0C_tv9aA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <51D83AAC.4080200@gmail.com>	<87y59jo6yq.fsf@igel.home>	<51D97472.8010704@gmail.com>	<CAH6eHdSzVcjpVzktBfi6n0cNq=DfBOADAP3BpvTqydmzCFwbCQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAAiZkiB0W3Lbv63eXcpP6EYhbj-t4DJ=zvFEsSfer_n6nKM_wA@mail.gmail.com>	<CAH6eHdS9v+GyLvVYEjVDbuFtGxwn27-VhqEofykYMe0C_tv9aA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 05:17:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAAiZkiBjh3iR+Gsh2etKRnzO2q=N5iBnXQgwwod4vOELSsbLRA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file
From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
Cc: Bruce Korb <bruce.korb@gmail.com>, Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>, GCC <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-SW-Source: 2013-07/txt/msg00094.txt.bz2

On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7 July 2013 21:33, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>> How about not enabling multi lib build by default on targets we now that
>> will fail anyway?  I have the suspicion this problem is unique to openSUSE,
>> so we can take care of that.
>
> I'm pretty sure I've seen it happen with RHEL and Fedora, and Ubuntu
> users have asked about the same thing on the gcc-help list.

Ha, if it is that spread then we might have even more reasons to
have it work more generally, for example, by disabling multilib by default.
I think the situation we are in now is very different from the situation
we were in more than a decade ago.

-- Gaby