From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6054 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2012 18:03:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 6044 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Apr 2012 18:03:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ob0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-ob0-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 18:02:49 +0000 Received: by obbuo13 with SMTP id uo13so6609897obb.20 for ; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 11:02:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.51.73 with SMTP id i9mr11894061obo.17.1333994568612; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 11:02:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.92.168 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 11:02:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201204091929.52330.ebotcazou@adacore.com> Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 18:03:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: RFC: -Wall by default From: Gabriel Dos Reis To: Jonathan Wakely Cc: Eric Botcazou , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Gerald Pfeifer , Robert Dewar , James Cloos , Miles Bader , Ian Lance Taylor , Andrew Haley Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00286.txt.bz2 On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > Maybe -Wstandard isn't the best name though, as "standard" usually > means something quite specific for compilers, and the warning switch > wouldn't have anything to do with standards conformance. I agree. I have been resisting to go there for fear of derailing the discussion, but I am open to better suggestion. -Wsanity? :-) -- Gaby