From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25514 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2012 21:40:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 25505 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Apr 2012 21:40:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ob0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-ob0-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:40:19 +0000 Received: by obbuo13 with SMTP id uo13so3716775obb.20 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:40:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.26.15 with SMTP id h15mr5297060obg.27.1334266819121; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:40:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.92.168 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:40:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F874B70.9080307@adacore.com> References: <20120411085055.GD12165@xvii.vinc17.org> <4F86AD2F.4010506@gmail.com> <4F86E8FE.20407@adacore.com> <4F86EACE.9070301@gmail.com> <4F86EE3F.3050804@gmail.com> <4F86F1C9.3070505@adacore.com> <4F86F5B0.2020207@adacore.com> <4F874161.7060406@gmail.com> <4F874B70.9080307@adacore.com> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:40:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: RFC: -Wall by default From: Gabriel Dos Reis To: Robert Dewar Cc: Dave Korn , Jonathan Wakely , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00537.txt.bz2 On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Robert Dewar wrote: > On 4/12/2012 5:35 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > >>> =A0There's nothing more ambiguous than saying that something is final i= n a >>> world where perfection is never achieved. =A0That's why software has >>> monotonically increasing version numbers, instead of just one that means >>> "this >>> is done now". >> >> >> As I observed earlier, Geodelization is great for machines. > > > You observed this before, but it was nonsense then It isn't non-sense just because you decide so or you don't like the observa= tion. > and > nonsense now, this has nothing to do with incompleteness! >> >> >> -- Gaby > >