From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-173452-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 22942 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2012 22:42:33 -0000
Received: (qmail 22934 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Apr 2012 22:42:33 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-ob0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-ob0-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 22:42:20 +0000
Received: by obbuo13 with SMTP id uo13so1008499obb.20        for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 15:42:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.51.73 with SMTP id i9mr330166obo.17.1333579340125; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 15:42:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.92.168 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 15:42:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4F7CBB6E.5090504@adacore.com>
References: <20120404183438.CCA083BE18@mailhost.lps.ens.fr>	<4F7CBB6E.5090504@adacore.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 22:42:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAAiZkiCN+MUswRyDJv36m=W785MRB54ftRBWQt+tYFcNzMNgEA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: -Wall by default
From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
To: Robert Dewar <dewar@adacore.com>
Cc: Dominique Dhumieres <dominiq@lps.ens.fr>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, law@redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00129.txt.bz2

On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Robert Dewar <dewar@adacore.com> wrote:
> On 4/4/2012 2:34 PM, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
>
>> IMO only the warnings in C that are likely errors should be the default as
>> it is in gfortran (don't ask for examples of such warnings for C, I am
>> quasi-illiterate).
>
>
> That's also the default philosophy in GNAT,

In which case you should NOT be objecting to the proposal :-)

>  there never should be false
> positives at all in the default mode IMO (well hardly ever :-)
>
>>
>>
>> Dominique
>>
>> PS -Wall is a simple enough option to be remembered by all users who need
>> it (if they don't use it, they don't want it).
>
>