From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2695 invoked by alias); 19 Oct 2011 06:17:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 2673 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Oct 2011 06:17:44 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-bw0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-bw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.214.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 06:17:28 +0000 Received: by bkat8 with SMTP id t8so1995084bka.20 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:17:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.76.135 with SMTP id c7mr9162160fak.16.1319005047453; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:17:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.11.36 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:17:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20111018171201.361304028ab94f102f827bd2@starynkevitch.net> <20111018191350.470cd6b1cd291373d5ff3f2c@starynkevitch.net> <20111019080021.4e1acb3687fc8ceacc2fd7a3@starynkevitch.net> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 07:41:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: adding destroyable objects into Ggc From: Gabriel Dos Reis To: GCC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00312.txt.bz2 On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 1:00 AM, Basile Starynkevitch wrote: > However, I don't often see the people arguing against Ggc talking about t= he difficulties > for GCC newscomers to dive inside GCC and be able to propose code. =46rom my experience, the difficulty for newcomer to get into GCC source code base has less to do with GC than the compiler overall architecture itself. =A0I believe it would be naively deceptive to make people believe t= hat the absence of GC is what makes or would make GCC impenetrable to newcomers. -- Gaby