From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-170836-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17631 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2011 23:53:42 -0000
Received: (qmail 17623 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Oct 2011 23:53:41 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-bw0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-bw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.214.47)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 23:53:17 +0000
Received: by bkat8 with SMTP id t8so6124680bka.20        for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 16:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.6.25 with SMTP id 25mr27679781fax.14.1319241196173; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 16:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.152.25.98 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 16:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20111021225635.d0b5fe0b81daeb82a503dafd@starynkevitch.net>
References: <20111018171201.361304028ab94f102f827bd2@starynkevitch.net>	<mcr62jm5kcb.fsf@coign.corp.google.com>	<20111018191350.470cd6b1cd291373d5ff3f2c@starynkevitch.net>	<CAPOVtOvJ74c2rHx5JSkUjo8HGrHnnhBdAq8O8bf-e=FeSQrQFw@mail.gmail.com>	<CAGqM8fZeHym4nKF-RixukW1G+C5K1iUHHHEg1yA+tG-K1_jtyA@mail.gmail.com>	<20111020080753.a895eae452bb25e312ebf617@starynkevitch.net>	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1110200903470.2398@laptop-mg.saclay.inria.fr>	<20111020081245.GA12085@ours.starynkevitch.net>	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1110201031180.3550@stedding.saclay.inria.fr>	<20111020085324.GA12472@ours.starynkevitch.net>	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1110201708080.2378@laptop-mg.saclay.inria.fr>	<20111021080914.08528e83f5eb53897d92fee9@starynkevitch.net>	<CAFiYyc0DzJ2CgB1zyk_M_Qr3zOyHxnn8dnePXhPoeA_pW_suEg@mail.gmail.com>	<20111021225635.d0b5fe0b81daeb82a503dafd@starynkevitch.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 01:31:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAAiZkiCrOy4LZbzmO67M-_eKyLMsjjRUi1PWQ1gOxf_xNyDcwA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: adding destroyable objects into Ggc
From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
To: Basile Starynkevitch <basile@starynkevitch.net>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00394.txt.bz2

On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Basile Starynkevitch
<basile@starynkevitch.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 10:43:29 +0200
> Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
>> So there is no inherent limitation with the GGC machinery.
>
> There are at least some annoyances:

can you think of C++ ways to remove those without prescribing more GC?