From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13352 invoked by alias); 11 Apr 2012 16:49:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 13339 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Apr 2012 16:49:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f47.google.com (HELO mail-lpp01m010-f47.google.com) (209.85.215.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:49:24 +0000 Received: by lagw12 with SMTP id w12so886164lag.20 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:49:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-system-of-record :x-gm-message-state; bh=BhlhEJYiDc6d2oQL0XGYCG2w1orlxiguZ0Hzpen5uuI=; b=NQx9WrFkG2dHU27C1EcjBX1y7Ap/sHa79j6VexjGyCV0qeK8+XstLZkFk6A+Qe9D+h umI9Yq6nrSOwHmP1XJWuHQspC2cKwuqtQpBbE5fy9HdAjrpnEY+CLmcSJ0+50n284b4a UePQo2pR4UiI9AcywcOeNkJiV2xkMXzbdbyQR5luiweuegFJYrRFWRQ+kmSXesBDDov0 9VX8/Siun7u6c02UlaudfKYlw3L4HEcEalz79F73EY3LsZvTOoQpsjSmKLekQyoqjZXp KKtPT8UI9rNOvT1xDROp3k9/8rYMFb/pJmsFyh81/JmC+8s2+qjA85/tHQGEf+3mmWW3 MfpQ== Received: by 10.152.123.229 with SMTP id md5mr18726795lab.34.1334162957853; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:49:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.123.229 with SMTP id md5mr18724468lab.34.1334162910564; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:48:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.4.233 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:48:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120411124346.GA2941@redhat.com> References: <4F7C35A3.3080207@codesourcery.com> <20120410084614.GJ6148@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <20120410163905.GK6148@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <20120411124346.GA2941@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:49:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Switching to C++ by default in 4.8 From: Xinliang David Li To: Marek Polacek Cc: Jakub Jelinek , Richard Guenther , Bernd Schmidt , Gabriel Dos Reis , David Edelsohn , Diego Novillo , gcc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-System-Of-Record: true X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlfLMLOXgKDvDx1WLkU9M1cXzgr7qpfqfa68diHw9ixCuwvKRIoxxfsiuIDdr9ureOozxKJ7lSaraeEucre0gyvkB/yPI+UmisUz+yvn4kBZKmh/RgNVoFvfIdwXBxURk/74w1b X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00430.txt.bz2 On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Marek Polacek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:54:01AM -0700, Xinliang David Li wrote: >> manipulation -- be it C or C++. However I think this is really more >> about the general perceptions and how future developers feel about it. > > If GCC would ever be in C++, that would be a very strong argument for > me _not_ to touch it. > haha -- I guess a survey in gcc@ would help here :) David > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Marek