From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2902 invoked by alias); 7 Jan 2020 15:53:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2894 invoked by uid 89); 7 Jan 2020 15:53:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*i:sk:ca2efd2, H*f:sk:ca2efd2, sk:ljrittl, U*ljrittle X-HELO: mail-ua1-f67.google.com Received: from mail-ua1-f67.google.com (HELO mail-ua1-f67.google.com) (209.85.222.67) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 15:53:12 +0000 Received: by mail-ua1-f67.google.com with SMTP id 1so18674608uao.1 for ; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 07:53:11 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Loren James Rittle Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2020 15:53:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Test GCC conversion with reposurgeon available To: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-SW-Source: 2020-01/txt/msg00058.txt.bz2 Richard, Thanks for the offer, but no need. Just wanted to confirm with some detail that I reviewed aspects of the svn-git conversion and LGTM. BTW, I too saw the issue (in 14 out of 261 master commits) reported by Andrew where (in my case) "ljrittle@gcc.gnu.org" was used in Author line(s) rather than the expected e-mail. In every one of my cases, it appears because no exact Changelog text was related to the commit rather than, as in Andrew's analysis of case mismatches. Regards, Loren On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 3:41 AM Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > > On 06/01/2020 22:09, Loren James Rittle wrote: > > On Fri, 3 Jan 2020, Joseph Myers wrote: > > > >> git+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/home/gccadmin/gcc-reposurgeon-7a.git > >> git+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/home/gccadmin/gcc-reposurgeon-7b.git > > > > I have not had a substantial commit to gcc [or, likely, post to this > > list] in a decade THUS a warm howdy to anyone still around from > > 1999-2009. Every "git log" entry for my commits looked fine. There > > were two odd cases, but both now make sense to me. My first commit's > > Author line (1999) contains a physical machine name (but it correctly > > matches the contemporary Changelog entry). The second odd case took > > more time to understand: > > > > In gcc-reposurgeon-7a, commit hash 16fc918929 ; I corrected a prior > > Changelog (for 89903bf801). I would not expect any version control > > system translation process to look ahead for such textual changes to a > > side-maintained ChangeLog file but I was somewhat stumped on why the > > ChangeLog text did not match the "git log" text. > > > > Regards, > > Loren > > > > We can add a correction so that the git 'Author' field will be fixed, if > you would like; but the ChangeLog and commit message will remain as is. > > R.