From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-174117-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 1649 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2012 17:00:20 -0000
Received: (qmail 1572 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Apr 2012 17:00:17 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-yw0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-yw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.213.47)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:00:00 +0000
Received: by yhjj56 with SMTP id j56so6774862yhj.20        for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:59:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.175.164 with SMTP id z24mr15646070yhl.101.1335200399142; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:59:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.101.118.15 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:59:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABu31nO9reOCtUBHTdo4G7zs+Jcry7=9xs=OjD3_TOvGHgJgEA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABu31nNyBhnWHyA1y2r8G8G--QjO2vd_=2Cb1=WqFKr8VpX0xQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFiYyc3ZdJG_F=LeAo5JpUT_S9Ku9wV7db15EP_ZOpapXf1crA@mail.gmail.com>	<CABu31nO9reOCtUBHTdo4G7zs+Jcry7=9xs=OjD3_TOvGHgJgEA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:00:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CABu31nNknv6pFp+djEtqFrsUZUeYJpRX=iWmBOw4PZM3tyNodQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: A case where PHI-OPT pessimizes the code
From: Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc@gmail.com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Cc: GCC Mailing List <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>, Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>, Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00794.txt.bz2

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
> I will file a PR for this later today, maybe after trying on a few
> other targets to see if this is a middle-end problem or a target
> issue.

This is now PR target/53087 (http://gcc.gnu.org/PR53087).

Actually the poor code looks to be coming from the &-operation, not
from the _Bool->int conversion. But I don't know enough powerpc-speak
to be sure...

Ciao!
Steven