From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi1-x232.google.com (mail-oi1-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::232]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14324385802D for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 04:18:10 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 14324385802D Received: by mail-oi1-x232.google.com with SMTP id be32so38757440oib.11 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 20:18:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wqUzkqdXV0jyD7SGvhoDjsywa+HBtfQM7L2Ga2dzaTc=; b=X7ADo+ACwWM9xzeEbgoNB/l13qTwMPtX1Jw/BX5zE0HMYZX0oP4c5saEFBZMRgGUCR mqbo2tZgfvYVLCxnnqWERmmX+NeT9UCQIPhlyrY2OrMkeLvBDt5y9Ug/4yemySPODJCi m7Sv/PQo9lQZnZE8fe2ndf37XMQ4P3bYCf86uuOe3xRrB13q19Mo4z1aB6f47tT6AeQf D21heUI5JlwHdCBbPpVwHkYaW/0zNV2mzfyN1Pih+N3UCQ8xyPcG1evaW5fY5UgzBVPW MNM9/UiBS+EVkNGgUW/nUUeakWUWy3Kx6+AYybMM7jz9ivOXUFtmUTl160ihPQknqWxa Q90w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531vwlHf7deD0E6BBJfpMvohKbyWZY7I/PYo0E5l4nm89nPP6uXl fWEbzBTDUxIoxZFrlR5dVLbdjJ6tujGjMHRuj9x36w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyb1RsymuKGFd6yJFMDYXhjSo7BhOMmuY6+M94NYmSbSyjYJIjlEymZjpUfQ98LpFJT9456/e1LEmqykfJfwZc= X-Received: by 2002:aca:b843:: with SMTP id i64mr2120671oif.109.1638245889203; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 20:18:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <7506afec-035a-bf4f-1dd7-f022423f4627@suse.cz> <32f8b7ad-d6ae-3e7f-6372-212c21dbbe07@suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <32f8b7ad-d6ae-3e7f-6372-212c21dbbe07@suse.cz> From: Dmitry Vyukov Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 05:17:57 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: New ThreadSanitizer runtime (v3) To: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=C5=A1ka?= Cc: gcc , ro@gcc.gnu.org, Jakub Jelinek , =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=C5=A1ka?= , Marco Elver , Alexander Potapenko Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 04:18:11 -0000 On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 19:16, Martin Li=C5=A1ka wrote: > > On 11/22/21 20:01, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > > I've already reverted the change. So I will include a fix into the next= version. > > Thanks for notifying. > > Hello. > > Am I correct that the patch set is installed again? Any near future plans= for another > revert of the patch? Do you think it's the right time to merge it to GCC? It has been re-landed at least twice since then :) Well, I can't promise that it won't be reverted again. I obviously do not want that. Hard to say. I need to send some follow up clean up patches and I plan to wait till the end of the week (to avoid messy multi commit reverts). So if there are no deadlines to miss, I would suggest waiting until the beginning of the next week.