public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Bug 89889 - worse code compared to clang with alloca()
@ 2019-05-20  7:39 Lokesh Janghel
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Lokesh Janghel @ 2019-05-20  7:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: john.boyer, pinskia, rguenth, gcc

Hi,

As per our analysis on the issue, I have some queries as per below:

Is there any target hooks for alloca?
Should we do the same like __builtin_alloca_with_align (array
allocation) or we assume the problem as a target based
(prologue/epilogue optimization) issue?


-- 
Thanks
Lokesh

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2019-05-20  7:39 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-05-20  7:39 Bug 89889 - worse code compared to clang with alloca() Lokesh Janghel

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).