From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=zP3p=4I=gmail.com=hongjiewu1225@sourceware.org>
Received: from mail-pl1-x62e.google.com (mail-pl1-x62e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62e])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B27638369CE
	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 02:01:37 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 5B27638369CE
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com
Received: by mail-pl1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id d7so6687968pll.9
        for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 18:01:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
        h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=Py+rVjfhZ20FQ5vtpUxC+Dsmvli8MXZlZpJRnXObHg8=;
        b=VqElIMaxsBgDEFbEHD5wMkt4Mnuqt7C8SvCsk/Yc2beiorWF6ApUPr1rdbGUEhbNa5
         nefR1QxtEZ/3unedz1ndzj+quXqTcyBIAgrPrqJZ+v+plWsZobPEyRIqAbqitTCB9hKM
         Q/bTNEFO3XIRSMIV8W4GKQ8AUTeP7pX5Je+/WFEkjry3jaNY8f1qkXJsAX+epdds8Hxj
         P8lPKu70alYUsAQAH/D8+UuMRL408/15aQAwUNgjgWahS6pozKEObgaRlUFBTKaDq3Fk
         igGSzVl9bUiPDrEZZ0gQ9qkoVRARvXaEB9E+vqlPqRKeX7OapWI+Ir6Qi01le8qxuRpk
         e07A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
        h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
         :reply-to;
        bh=Py+rVjfhZ20FQ5vtpUxC+Dsmvli8MXZlZpJRnXObHg8=;
        b=harQaUoUBmGtD1oHAiII3aVIVoj52zo0xWu5uQzj+gbwOPf3o9qc1QcDR3BNEzWnnA
         l8Fc3P8B6e4BWDFSFGTNdlh2zH7W2JjgA/23dEnRzcGiiJ36IPk3LcsSevPBlxczEBCG
         5Ueq6TsJ7ryOBjNOYXvKM8bgp5+napByzHKiNca6gHtXQHzLnyowrwKZQJGIvNAgSPdc
         DfsKsq9fkXXG0P2K2hVclHXhWvcRHkXWhM4Qgdzn0pXQISJiuVggq36pogEmpleuRFay
         04pyTb6vJqQqMfqHqzKCmLnrYawnFPavSk7eWc18vOy2Ne958pxFtgj20lsiuzEW5oi2
         tx6g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pktMWoB6N+BMWJN+7agnmXChOy4geLEzzxFZh6aQW5dku2lTmIS
	zXEWboliKOrflmWj6aoMwEUOMbfnQM3RsOULmi0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf6wVa9EkoNMJG8AoB/B8gGvD8aq8/zrlaG62T8MLo9JkYh3QVJB6OLj7Fv9PUC+xTDh47noorf5O5fum5X4r9w=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:8402:b0:218:7744:5e9 with SMTP id
 j2-20020a17090a840200b00218774405e9mr106361515pjn.44.1670637695973; Fri, 09
 Dec 2022 18:01:35 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAEKG5iCx1tM0THyL6XyW9k1JxqWVfJ9RRuP4Bjf_JXG6ZRayrw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAH6eHdQ+hLhJ2wE4EbgoVfZhdFS2MWfS4DE=_DEyg1F0OeCEfw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH6eHdQ+hLhJ2wE4EbgoVfZhdFS2MWfS4DE=_DEyg1F0OeCEfw@mail.gmail.com>
From: hongjie wu <hongjiewu1225@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2022 10:01:24 +0800
Message-ID: <CAEKG5iBa8JPD5n43pGUN3dSzrppxq7C6=JFGhxc-Q_8cSbo83Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: The method of determining the specific assignment of gcc
 optimization options
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006abf3d05ef6fa670"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,BODY_8BITS,DEAR_SOMETHING,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>

--0000000000006abf3d05ef6fa670
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thank you for your response.

Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com> =E4=BA=8E2022=E5=B9=B412=E6=9C=889=
=E6=97=A5=E5=91=A8=E4=BA=94 22:40=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A

> This question belongs on the gcc-help mailing list, not here.
>
> On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 at 12:01, hongjie wu via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Sir or Madam=EF=BC=8C
> >         I want to know how to obtain optimal level of the value of the
>
> What do you mean by optimal?
>
> They have pros and cons.
>
> > specific compiler options, for example  - fexcess - precision =3D [fast=
 |
> > standard] [default], including the default represent=EF=BC=9FOr how to =
determine?
>
> gcc -Q --help=3Doptim
>
> >         I am looking forward to your favorable replay.
>

--0000000000006abf3d05ef6fa670--