From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <creatorsmithmdt@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-oi1-x22a.google.com (mail-oi1-x22a.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22a])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 093333858C51
 for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 12:15:15 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 093333858C51
Received: by mail-oi1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id v4so748113oiv.1
 for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 05:15:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=0+I2HEg14mYQyYzrdK9Cc1myu3wbZBkbahQh3swHjuw=;
 b=rGB4PNoaxVvLwxJu6Wan9+3Zfaz+z649HwhhScdAOt7rhnAp7xXZJTbR8JB2dxiKWO
 U2PzKnouW5NKJV40DHZ56Bmgk7laD6aKg8PN9s3eg7Mq2exn1VHsFsX+3FSnSFljzfGF
 JBBUigN/AVTo+8OKKYpKMpo1MEKlxcD5RsQIFjcjT3Wg/91FFSl72yJSoHkPHKu8bu7e
 Sbv1/noJC/tHgB1u0byNSxeiDph5xXr+nnhMh8OzVWSvUq+UTqgfWHzK0rY90uhb8io6
 qtbM2zO5U94KnXSu9smczXrXrpQyEg5xfTiJcgHyIdn5Qv2SvXO4ERoIc2YGn40b+AgA
 1ptg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5319qQXaHnH53q9NUFzs065owcGRtxHKSLuzsUzal55Sa4cTsJ2U
 DTgShAo7Rg4BRqAK9n2aFKQNZM9aLB0y5cjk5Ygq56Oz
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJycX1daKelXGfNJhnkYdkK32IWBvrajSUeuWvhQe/K/bCgG9uHFLbH/5teHo01jah/dUWyueWtEDjTPE+FVsVM=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:211a:b0:32e:ecdc:90 with SMTP id
 r26-20020a056808211a00b0032eecdc0090mr1981670oiw.250.1655208914026; Tue, 14
 Jun 2022 05:15:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Zopolis0 <creatorsmithmdt@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 22:15:02 +1000
Message-ID: <CAEYL+X83mWrc7ObRyrt1iQREgMViMQPXZbHwup4P_4i=EgOogA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: std::format support?
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
 server2.sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29
X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc mailing list <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc>,
 <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc>,
 <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 12:15:16 -0000

There was some discussion around std::format support 2 years ago, with
people suggesting to just use the fmt code, and others suggesting that an
independent implementation might be of higher quality. 2 years have since
passed, and we have no implementation, of higher or identical quality.
Could we come to a decision on this? Having no implementation whatsoever is
the worst possible outcome.