From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yb1-f179.google.com (mail-yb1-f179.google.com [209.85.219.179]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F37553858D1E for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 16:55:08 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org F37553858D1E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rtems.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-yb1-f179.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-bd744ffc263so3923481276.3 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 09:55:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1687193708; x=1689785708; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=LAb/jcdBDSeWr3Ys0ReziL+AjTQlfMOqkvI4X+/FRe8=; b=CryxOuhZb0tVipcGjrAqiyyrD6xIQ+1+JIfd3hDv3O13P4VVCn2ktuD2K85MdSSYmh EqA4xT2Z+7bv3ioEmYKMep7ERto96PBlt65rD6Yx3lrq8GTIrelHaUazVjMLdlE7hvRz uBU2IQr0Kmm9bG7kwgfzlvmXS8Sz7mwG+DhFIQ04oHBELcNgfLG9GQXXnYKyDqN+gZ5i Q7YZtU4WmHtJMid9aSBHBXOE+vNyddqFzsJPU6I8RCBHkeAy56knPa/plztMtBN2ntNr Qc6TfU8luvXqrff25E39OUJIdONNGp0YVu1kxxuz2qPrZ8R+tfdGCMLIyLepAoxTOT59 UFSA== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwVcxYNJo9D5+X3i+M7hshZBbY4uJg2OGeftPBu9nS7i3nFamx7 kE/ygPtyK0YbgTLCCEWvzTpdlMZErWk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ47l/ia+MN0ETQtSDsNPYHl76g2PPzYQQlIw1LrjjEnkoPJZDt4gHgcC4K8ZwezvjNj0sicAw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:510:b0:bc3:f186:73d8 with SMTP id x16-20020a056902051000b00bc3f18673d8mr6799416ybs.15.1687193707978; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 09:55:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-yw1-f173.google.com (mail-yw1-f173.google.com. [209.85.128.173]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 188-20020a250ac5000000b00bdd085da648sm2287501ybk.48.2023.06.19.09.55.07 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 19 Jun 2023 09:55:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yw1-f173.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-56d304e5f83so43231797b3.2 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 09:55:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a25:aa14:0:b0:b9e:8a8b:b073 with SMTP id s20-20020a25aa14000000b00b9e8a8bb073mr7179071ybi.39.1687193707104; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 09:55:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Reply-To: joel@rtems.org From: Joel Sherrill Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 11:54:54 -0500 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: gcc tricore porting To: Mikael Pettersson Cc: eterno.claudio@gmail.com, GCC Development Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000094506905fe7e6571" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3031.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESSAGE,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: --00000000000094506905fe7e6571 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Mon, Jun 19, 2023, 10:36 AM Mikael Pettersson via Gcc wrote: > (Note I'm reading the gcc mailing list via the Web archives, which > doesn't let me > create "proper" replies. Oh well.) > > On Sun Jun 18 09:58:56 GMT 2023, wrote: > > Hi, this is my first time with open source development. I worked in > > automotive for 22 years and we (generally) were using tricore series for > > these products. GCC doesn't compile on that platform. I left my work some > > days ago and so I'll have some spare time in the next few months. I would > > like to know how difficult it is to port the tricore platform on gcc and > if > > during this process somebody can support me as tutor and... also if the > gcc > > team is interested in this item... > > https://github.com/volumit has a port of gcc + binutils + newlib + gdb > to Tricore, > and it's not _that_ ancient. I have no idea where it originates from > or how complete > it is, but I do know the gcc-4.9.4 based one builds with some tweaks. > https://github.com/volumit/package_494 says there is a port in process to > gcc 9. Perhaps digging in and assessing that would be a good start. > One question is whether that code has proper assignments on file for ultimate inclusion. That should be part of your assessment. --joel > I don't know anything more about it, I'm just a collector of > cross-compilers for > obscure / lost / forgotten / abandoned targets. > > /Mikael > --00000000000094506905fe7e6571--