From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-199442-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 111180 invoked by alias); 19 Jun 2019 19:12:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 111162 invoked by uid 89); 19 Jun 2019 19:12:07 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,KAM_SHORT autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*i:CAH6eHdS9j71zb, H*f:CAH6eHdS9j71zb, H*i:mnU, H*i:sk:E-50uH6
X-HELO: mx.coeval.ca
Received: from mx.coeval.ca (HELO mx.coeval.ca) (184.75.211.21) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 19:12:06 +0000
Received: from mail-oi1-f178.google.com (mail-oi1-f178.google.com [209.85.167.178])	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))	(No client certificate requested)	by mx.coeval.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0007B436054	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 19:12:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oi1-f178.google.com with SMTP id w79so165575oif.10        for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 12:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAF9ehCU7Cht-zU15fioRSnTasuGO=yXYc4PLNVCZCXQ0Menuuw@mail.gmail.com> <CAH6eHdS9j71zb=mnU=E-50uH6PtFYV6dx-RORm9ShP5HJPqBFg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH6eHdS9j71zb=mnU=E-50uH6PtFYV6dx-RORm9ShP5HJPqBFg@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: joel@rtems.org
From: Joel Sherrill <joel@rtems.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 19:12:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAF9ehCXkpB52sA1+uBvALwu5Z1o=tk9NnzqbbBYBX_8LHRZ2Yg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: C++17 Support and Website
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
Cc: GCC <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2019-06/txt/msg00199.txt.bz2

On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 2:07 PM Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Wed, 19 Jun 2019 at 20:05, Joel Sherrill <joel@rtems.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I was double checking the C++17 support in GCC for someone and the text
> at
> > this URL states
> > the support is experimental and gives the impression that the support is
> > incomplete. The table
> > of language features now has them all implemented.
> >
> > Is this text still accurate?
>
> No, see the 9.1.0 announcement:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-announce/2019/msg00001.html
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html#cxx17
>
> We should fix that, thanks!
>

Thanks for the quick reply. If it is any consolation, LLVM's status page
appears
to similarly suffer from not getting the introductory text updated.