public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: "Martin Liška" <mliska@suse.cz>
Cc: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>,
	Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>,
		"Richard Earnshaw (lists)" <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>,
	Nathan Sidwell <nathan@acm.org>,
		GCC Development <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>,
	Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: git: remote: *** The first line of a commit message should be a short description of the change, not a single word.
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 09:38:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc12te91gO7h766J4FWv-yrSTPrA06mTwEM2YVAg0SB27A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0a2868f4-608c-85a7-b7e7-cdf86873da0a@suse.cz>

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 8:58 PM Martin Liška <mliska@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> On 1/21/20 6:30 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > Whether they make it to trunk or not doesn't really change the fact
> > that a one-word message is poor. If it's only on your local machine,
> > do what you like. The hook only complains when such a commit is
> > published on gcc.gnu.org.
>
> I would disagree here. I used 'WIP' as my commit message for a branch
> that is an experimental and potentially fixes a PR. GCC git is a central
> point for my setup, I need to push the branch in order to pull it from
> a different machine and test it there.

So just use "WIP WIP" then ...

> Moreover, as Jason said, one can have multiple commits that will be
> squashed anyway before a patch submission.
>
> Martin

      reply	other threads:[~2020-01-22  8:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-21 16:45 Martin Liška
2020-01-21 16:58 ` Jonathan Wakely
2020-01-21 17:05   ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-01-21 17:20     ` Nathan Sidwell
2020-01-21 17:31       ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-01-21 18:58         ` Jason Merrill
2020-01-21 19:58           ` Jonathan Wakely
2020-01-22  9:26             ` Martin Liška
2020-01-22  9:38               ` Richard Biener [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFiYyc12te91gO7h766J4FWv-yrSTPrA06mTwEM2YVAg0SB27A@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    --cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jason@redhat.com \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=jwakely.gcc@gmail.com \
    --cc=mliska@suse.cz \
    --cc=nathan@acm.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).