public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Cc: GCC Development <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: testsuite requires LTO?
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 09:26:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc1aEGWgoKQpACVL2HUhev7f-SmVJ0apW6qsC4qyXoDZhg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFiYyc2SsnpaCO29PgkJHPptBz6ZAPxV6z5sXR92ObP1cNu-Cg@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 9:07 AM Richard Biener
<richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 1:53 AM Steve Kargl via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> > If I configure gcc with the following
> >
> > ../gccx/configure --prefix=$HOME/work/x --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran \
> >   --enable-bootstrap --disable-nls --enable-checking --disable-multilib \
> >   --disable-libsanitizer --disable-lto.
> >
> > then bootstrap gcc, why do I see 1000s of failures with
> >
> > % cd gcc
> > % gmake -j7 check-c
> > ...
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr64365.c   -O2 -flto  (test for excess errors)
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr61786.c   -O2 -flto  (test for excess errors)
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr63380-2.c   -O2 -flto  (test for excess errors)
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr65270-2.c   -O2 -flto  (test for excess errors)
> >
> > Should the testsuite recognize that gcc is built without LTO support?
>
> Yes, it does, in testsuite/lib/gcc-dg.exp
>
> if [info exists TORTURE_OPTIONS] {
>     set DG_TORTURE_OPTIONS $TORTURE_OPTIONS
> } else {
>     # It is theoretically beneficial to group all of the O2/O3 options together,
>     # as in many cases the compiler will generate identical executables for
>     # all of them--and the c-torture testsuite will skip testing identical
>     # executables multiple times.
>     # Also note that -finline-functions is explicitly included in one of the
>     # items below, even though -O3 is also specified, because some ports may
>     # choose to disable inlining functions by default, even when optimizing.
>     set DG_TORTURE_OPTIONS [list \
>         { -O0 } \
>         { -O1 } \
>         { -O2 } \
>         { -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops
> -ftracer -finline-functions } \
>         { -O3 -g } \
>         { -Os } ]
>
>     if [check_effective_target_lto] {
>         # When having plugin test both slim and fat LTO and plugin/nonplugin
>         # path.
>         if [check_linker_plugin_available] {
>            set LTO_TORTURE_OPTIONS [list \
>               { -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none } \
>               { -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects }
>            ]
>         } else {
>            set LTO_TORTURE_OPTIONS [list \
>               { -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none } \
>               { -O2 -flto }
>            ]
>         }
>
> so either TORTURE_OPTIONS is set or check_effective_target_lto doesn't work.
> The check does simply
>
>     return [check_no_compiler_messages lto object {
>         void foo (void) { }
>     } "-flto"]
>
> so I wonder what your excess errors are?  The check above should also
> leave traces
> in the testsuite log.  It might be that --disable-lto doesn't disable
> gcc -c -flto but just
> disables lto1 building though.

I checked and it works fine for me, --disable-lto disables LTO support
and  there's
no extra FAILs in dg-torture.exp.  The testsuite log has

Executing on host: /tmp/obj/gcc/xgcc -B/tmp/obj/gcc/
-fdiagnostics-plain-output  -flto -c -o lto10207.o lto10207.c
(timeout = 300)
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /tmp/obj/gcc/xgcc -B/tmp/obj/gcc/
-fdiagnostics-plain-output -flto -c -o lto10207.o lto10207.c^M
cc1: error: LTO support has not been enabled in this configuration^M
compiler exited with status 1

which causes no -flto to be used.

Richard.

>
> >
> > --
> > Steve

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-12  7:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-11 23:51 Steve Kargl
2022-04-12  7:07 ` Richard Biener
2022-04-12  7:26   ` Richard Biener [this message]
2022-04-12 17:30     ` Steve Kargl
2022-04-12 17:42       ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-04-12 18:03         ` Steve Kargl
2022-04-12  7:41 ` Andreas Schwab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFiYyc1aEGWgoKQpACVL2HUhev7f-SmVJ0apW6qsC4qyXoDZhg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).