From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Cc: GCC Development <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: testsuite requires LTO?
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 09:26:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc1aEGWgoKQpACVL2HUhev7f-SmVJ0apW6qsC4qyXoDZhg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFiYyc2SsnpaCO29PgkJHPptBz6ZAPxV6z5sXR92ObP1cNu-Cg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 9:07 AM Richard Biener
<richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 1:53 AM Steve Kargl via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> > If I configure gcc with the following
> >
> > ../gccx/configure --prefix=$HOME/work/x --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran \
> > --enable-bootstrap --disable-nls --enable-checking --disable-multilib \
> > --disable-libsanitizer --disable-lto.
> >
> > then bootstrap gcc, why do I see 1000s of failures with
> >
> > % cd gcc
> > % gmake -j7 check-c
> > ...
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr64365.c -O2 -flto (test for excess errors)
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr61786.c -O2 -flto (test for excess errors)
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr63380-2.c -O2 -flto (test for excess errors)
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr65270-2.c -O2 -flto (test for excess errors)
> >
> > Should the testsuite recognize that gcc is built without LTO support?
>
> Yes, it does, in testsuite/lib/gcc-dg.exp
>
> if [info exists TORTURE_OPTIONS] {
> set DG_TORTURE_OPTIONS $TORTURE_OPTIONS
> } else {
> # It is theoretically beneficial to group all of the O2/O3 options together,
> # as in many cases the compiler will generate identical executables for
> # all of them--and the c-torture testsuite will skip testing identical
> # executables multiple times.
> # Also note that -finline-functions is explicitly included in one of the
> # items below, even though -O3 is also specified, because some ports may
> # choose to disable inlining functions by default, even when optimizing.
> set DG_TORTURE_OPTIONS [list \
> { -O0 } \
> { -O1 } \
> { -O2 } \
> { -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops
> -ftracer -finline-functions } \
> { -O3 -g } \
> { -Os } ]
>
> if [check_effective_target_lto] {
> # When having plugin test both slim and fat LTO and plugin/nonplugin
> # path.
> if [check_linker_plugin_available] {
> set LTO_TORTURE_OPTIONS [list \
> { -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none } \
> { -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects }
> ]
> } else {
> set LTO_TORTURE_OPTIONS [list \
> { -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none } \
> { -O2 -flto }
> ]
> }
>
> so either TORTURE_OPTIONS is set or check_effective_target_lto doesn't work.
> The check does simply
>
> return [check_no_compiler_messages lto object {
> void foo (void) { }
> } "-flto"]
>
> so I wonder what your excess errors are? The check above should also
> leave traces
> in the testsuite log. It might be that --disable-lto doesn't disable
> gcc -c -flto but just
> disables lto1 building though.
I checked and it works fine for me, --disable-lto disables LTO support
and there's
no extra FAILs in dg-torture.exp. The testsuite log has
Executing on host: /tmp/obj/gcc/xgcc -B/tmp/obj/gcc/
-fdiagnostics-plain-output -flto -c -o lto10207.o lto10207.c
(timeout = 300)
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /tmp/obj/gcc/xgcc -B/tmp/obj/gcc/
-fdiagnostics-plain-output -flto -c -o lto10207.o lto10207.c^M
cc1: error: LTO support has not been enabled in this configuration^M
compiler exited with status 1
which causes no -flto to be used.
Richard.
>
> >
> > --
> > Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-12 7:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-11 23:51 Steve Kargl
2022-04-12 7:07 ` Richard Biener
2022-04-12 7:26 ` Richard Biener [this message]
2022-04-12 17:30 ` Steve Kargl
2022-04-12 17:42 ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-04-12 18:03 ` Steve Kargl
2022-04-12 7:41 ` Andreas Schwab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAFiYyc1aEGWgoKQpACVL2HUhev7f-SmVJ0apW6qsC4qyXoDZhg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).