From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-199963-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 18205 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2019 13:06:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18193 invoked by uid 89); 20 Aug 2019 13:06:25 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_LOTSOFHASH,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Languages-Length:730, H*i:sk:141fcfc, H*f:sk:141fcfc, UD:sum
X-HELO: mail-lj1-f177.google.com
Received: from mail-lj1-f177.google.com (HELO mail-lj1-f177.google.com) (209.85.208.177) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 13:06:24 +0000
Received: by mail-lj1-f177.google.com with SMTP id m24so5040116ljg.8        for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 06:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to         :cc;        bh=PO0uxz/J/yMhV0nSDopcVw1uQ71kSBrMDThSmtFkNUY=;        b=goFuUQ+JzhkoLlHLTmh4liTNl98Lk9/j8w2Kj4/s6NtJUulraqJI9vP7QdGAcbdEgC         4XZkDhlP42ciOJ6EaewZISQi3eBBAk3KAgtLwn5kgUW5dJIEIgOPDQz4FcwyizTd+wB/         D7vncuIRiy9tNhbOMrjLEY7tMypVBeTcny4H03gsZV3Rc7JmozyG7MZqYWEtkwb/H8ek         3Z10XA6LkWq3r5VFncCdWy5hizKIthjJGOOqk07UqDkFrzy1A0S89rVGAAZ2GYUFFw9x         XzSgDYYd0wmW2XnPAdXm97Vljf6xf8cUSlNgsuj+CtNC6cex7Ek7lYoy8+cIV1wQTq9X         i+ZA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <141fcfc8-e503-702a-6988-7ff5e39b973a@malkuthstudio.org>
In-Reply-To: <141fcfc8-e503-702a-6988-7ff5e39b973a@malkuthstudio.org>
From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 13:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc2beG38LWCmPjWA8TpiH2ecNCC=PuwqJuh9Odp3EsxG_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: SHA-512 of gcc-9.2.0.tar.gz
To: Andrea Carretti Mambrini <andrea@malkuthstudio.org>
Cc: GCC Development <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2019-08/txt/msg00157.txt.bz2

On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 12:34 PM Andrea Carretti Mambrini
<andrea@malkuthstudio.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> calculated sha512 of *gcc-9.2.0.tar.gz* is:
> 55fead9cac2374b18134c17a143fc9317f67be834589303d31a7c3a6878e6bef22a0590fda902a07cb60f802df035e67975a8ab6a641048e0baa89af439a46ca
>
> but it's reported as:
> a916970e1d02c218d913744b171be5123475e2a31179812297c6812e93a6535eaf6aea0a52e0d5b0b6eb47410921d08306f96869777cc9400bd091611d2d8d15
>
> *gcc-9.2.0.tar.gz.sig*, *gcc-9.2.0.tar.xz* and *gcc-9.2.0.tar.xz.sig* sums are ok.
> Contents of *gcc-9.2.0.tar.gz* and *gcc-9.2.0.tar.xz* are identical.

I've removed the bougs sha512.sum file, it should be regenerated soon.

Richard.

> Regards,
> Andrea
>