From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-182627-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 21411 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2014 08:52:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21208 invoked by uid 89); 17 Mar 2014 08:52:48 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-wg0-f41.google.com
Received: from mail-wg0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-wg0-f41.google.com) (74.125.82.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 08:52:47 +0000
Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id n12so4390025wgh.24        for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 01:52:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.219.44 with SMTP id pl12mr8631073wic.12.1395046364272; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 01:52:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.185.180 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 01:52:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJXstsDnSn54JNVaN3ZY8b4LnfjgYJ=0p_+M+_GnYVTF3-NMrA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJXstsDSbO7QTSkJ-y4ftO4SshGkwYuow+U0nb4FdHSjHtfB=A@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFiYyc0UqPLoV76gUWiUXzCa3SxumXrmq7vsFtJ4GtnNjVrf3A@mail.gmail.com>	<CAJXstsAAA0=2ELCaai8SdM3e3S1S2hcigUF2A=s0jS-ytwCXdA@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFiYyc09sUOGGaPzRge6ysr1TzucGCMufFSQbTy5GADXWh5rTg@mail.gmail.com>	<CAJXstsAuf8PSvbFMudDV43xdJTQ5wxYoiRGO5MJ-u0QCZYVunw@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFiYyc0k=onaLtokpzsbbHDQ7SvotYdpkuF5z+UyVwC2JhkFnA@mail.gmail.com>	<CAJXstsCD1EEMKqB19-=7SOrsmQgNFn23+mUe0+S-bPULHLgbXg@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFiYyc2W7nmYnpBFF-xhO3G4rGzVLXvZoCaRV6UTo_2aZNxuxA@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFiYyc2WRuH7Am42zBQd2-h6tatsgX8Wn9ECb_b_QNq0FYTA1g@mail.gmail.com>	<CAJXstsC86wTB6oWdaCqtcR6vP4k4OJu0eAsoTLxsp_iXz48hvg@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFiYyc0xD8X9bwrg1iAziqZO-BOZ1vYkW+fm+8i75eUp_-pCyQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAJXstsDnSn54JNVaN3ZY8b4LnfjgYJ=0p_+M+_GnYVTF3-NMrA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 08:52:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc2dwsfrS=69bNw0JGBeJY4krM--Q0FUMmkup2pVvJ2YMA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gsoc 2014] moving fold-const patterns to gimple
From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Prathamesh Kulkarni <bilbotheelffriend@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg00242.txt.bz2

On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
<bilbotheelffriend@gmail.com> wrote:
> In c_expr::c_expr, shouldn't OP_C_EXPR be passed to operand
> constructor instead of OP_EXPR ?

Indeed - I have committed the fix.

Thanks,
Richard.

> This caused segfault for patterns when "simplification" operand was
> only c_expr (patch attached).
>
> * genmatch.c (c_expr::c_expr): use OP_C_EXPR instead of OP_EXPR in
> call to operand constructor.