From: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
Cc: David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>,
Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com>, gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Switching to C++ by default in 4.8
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 10:02:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc2jcg-mm+wV9foPcxH_vcUV1NEjmLkd-81szR78ivMSKQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFiYyc27DpgyxbEU70f_ZnSQ5bR4Y6W-_JycUk5vZGEE=_6DEg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Richard Guenther
<richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis
> <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Richard Guenther
>> <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis
>>> <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:13 PM, David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We would like to start the process to make GCC 4.8 build in C++ mode by
>>>>>> default.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The mechanics of the change are simple enough. I volunteer to test changing
>>>>>> the default on all primary targets (assuming I can get them from the GCC
>>>>>> build farm).
>>>>>
>>>>> I appreciate the motivation, but this may cause major problems on
>>>>> non-GNU/Linux platforms. Testing on all primary targets is not
>>>>> enough.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you expect GCC to be able to bootstrap starting from a vendor C++
>>>>> compiler or will this require G++?
>>>>
>>>> I would expect that we use C++03, and any C++ compiler.
>>>
>>> Yes. Thus, for stage1 we should force -std=c++03 -pedantic if we
>>> build with GCC to
>>> avoid creep in of GNU features.
>>
>> Fully agreed.
>>
>>> Btw, I think we should only start forcing C++ when 1) there is a
>>> branch/patch out
>>> that shows benefit from using C++. I previously mentioned that I'd like to see
>>> 2) a patch that _properly_ wraps a C++ class for consumption by our garbage
>>> collector (thus, not a hack that works for a specific case but infrastructure
>>> that we think will work for _all_ cases, including libstdc++ container use).
>>
>> I was actually thinking starting with abstractions that do not interact directly
>> with the memory manager, because I would like us to get our feet wet
>> before doing the full plunge. Such a work would be confined to a part of
>> the compiler (say the C++ front-end). Any particular reason you would
>> like to start
>> with the garbage collector which touches just about anything?
>
> Because the garbage collector is the thing that will block reasonable use
> of C++ if we cannot get it working. And because of the fear that if we
> don't show how to do it _right_ first then people will start inventing a dozent
> different ways of making it work for a special case.
>
> Note that I don't think it will touch everything. I remember we discussed how
> to do it and basically settled on something like
>
> template <class T>
> struct gc_mark {
> static void mark (T *) {}
> }
>
> and specializations that actually do something meaningful.
>
> which we can provide specializations for all existing types walked by
> gengtype trivially. This would provide a way to support GCing objects
> whose types are not "supported" by gengtype - gengtype would simply
> emit gc_mark<T>::mark () calls which are trivially optimized away
> if there is nothing to mark.
>
> That said - somebody would need to prototype that, and VEC is a good
> candidate I think because it's used both with GC and non-GC memory.
This will, of course, be also a challenge for various non-GCC host C++
compilers ;) (let's hope they get this part of templates right ... thus,
let's avoid the need to do partial specialization at least).
> Richard.
>
>> -- Gaby
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-04 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 182+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-03 17:38 Diego Novillo
2012-04-03 19:39 ` Paweł Sikora
2012-04-03 20:52 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2012-04-03 21:34 ` Paweł Sikora
2012-04-20 20:14 ` Joseph S. Myers
2012-04-04 5:19 ` Basile Starynkevitch
2012-04-04 1:13 ` David Edelsohn
2012-04-04 4:00 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2012-04-04 4:42 ` Miles Bader
2012-04-04 8:32 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2012-04-04 9:06 ` Richard Guenther
2012-04-04 9:10 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2012-04-04 9:15 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2012-04-04 9:59 ` Richard Guenther
2012-04-04 10:02 ` Richard Guenther [this message]
2012-04-04 11:20 ` Diego Novillo
2012-04-04 11:38 ` Richard Guenther
2012-04-04 14:12 ` Tom Tromey
2012-04-04 14:45 ` Richard Guenther
2012-04-04 14:48 ` Richard Guenther
2012-04-14 1:35 ` Chiheng Xu
2012-04-14 9:09 ` Robert Dewar
2012-04-14 10:03 ` Chiheng Xu
2012-04-14 11:13 ` Robert Dewar
2012-04-14 11:41 ` Jonathan Wakely
2012-04-14 10:39 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2012-04-14 11:08 ` Robert Dewar
2012-04-16 9:37 ` Chiheng Xu
2012-04-16 9:38 ` Jonathan Wakely
2012-04-17 9:11 ` Robert Dewar
2012-04-05 12:40 ` Pedro Lamarão
2012-04-05 13:05 ` Richard Guenther
2012-04-05 14:21 ` Diego Novillo
2012-04-05 14:24 ` Richard Guenther
2012-04-05 14:36 ` Diego Novillo
2012-04-05 20:17 ` David Edelsohn
2012-04-05 20:36 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2012-04-06 0:11 ` David Edelsohn
2012-04-09 10:37 ` Richard Guenther
2012-04-09 15:07 ` David Edelsohn
2012-04-10 22:04 ` Pedro Lamarão
2012-04-10 22:56 ` Diego Novillo
2012-04-04 11:53 ` Bernd Schmidt
2012-04-04 12:04 ` Richard Guenther
2012-04-04 14:59 ` Diego Novillo
2012-04-04 17:54 ` Lawrence Crowl
2012-04-05 9:18 ` Richard Guenther
2012-04-05 20:07 ` Lawrence Crowl
2012-04-09 10:40 ` Richard Guenther
2012-04-09 17:56 ` Lawrence Crowl
2012-04-09 18:22 ` Jakub Jelinek
2012-04-09 18:52 ` Lawrence Crowl
2012-04-09 18:54 ` Jakub Jelinek
2012-04-09 21:15 ` Lawrence Crowl
2012-04-10 11:09 ` Richard Guenther
2012-04-11 1:36 ` Lawrence Crowl
2012-04-11 6:55 ` Jakub Jelinek
2012-04-13 23:26 ` Dave Korn
2012-04-11 9:32 ` Richard Guenther
2012-04-14 3:07 ` Chiheng Xu
2012-04-14 3:04 ` Chiheng Xu
2012-04-14 21:25 ` Lawrence Crowl
2012-04-09 23:34 ` Xinliang David Li
2012-04-10 8:46 ` Jakub Jelinek
2012-04-10 12:26 ` Michael Matz
2012-04-10 15:51 ` David Edelsohn
2012-04-10 16:05 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2012-04-10 16:13 ` Diego Novillo
2012-04-11 9:17 ` Richard Guenther
2012-04-11 16:35 ` Xinliang David Li
2012-04-10 16:12 ` Xinliang David Li
2012-04-10 16:24 ` Michael Matz
2012-04-10 17:08 ` Xinliang David Li
2012-04-10 17:29 ` Torvald Riegel
2012-04-10 18:00 ` Eric Botcazou
2012-04-10 19:56 ` Torvald Riegel
2012-04-10 21:13 ` Eric Botcazou
2012-04-10 21:29 ` Torvald Riegel
2012-04-10 23:15 ` Eric Botcazou
2012-04-11 20:57 ` Torvald Riegel
2012-04-11 21:15 ` Eric Botcazou
2012-04-11 21:43 ` Torvald Riegel
2012-04-13 23:33 ` Dave Korn
2012-04-11 9:24 ` Richard Guenther
2012-04-11 12:58 ` Torvald Riegel
2012-04-11 13:13 ` Richard Guenther
2012-04-11 13:23 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2012-04-11 14:19 ` Torvald Riegel
2012-04-11 17:24 ` Xinliang David Li
2012-04-11 18:17 ` Andrew Pinski
2012-04-11 20:02 ` Xinliang David Li
2012-04-12 5:08 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2012-04-12 6:12 ` Miles Bader
2012-04-12 6:22 ` James Dennett
2012-04-11 18:26 ` Jonathan Wakely
2012-04-11 18:41 ` Pedro Alves
2012-04-11 20:00 ` Xinliang David Li
2012-04-11 20:05 ` Jonathan Wakely
2012-04-12 5:10 ` Ian Lance Taylor
[not found] ` <12130397.ZsTVnyYbKR@pawels>
2012-04-11 13:14 ` Richard Guenther
2012-04-11 13:24 ` Bernd Schmidt
2012-04-11 17:31 ` Xinliang David Li
2012-04-11 18:37 ` Basile Starynkevitch
2012-04-11 18:52 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2012-04-11 20:14 ` Xinliang David Li
2012-04-12 15:51 ` Ludovic Courtès
2012-04-13 23:45 ` Dave Korn
2012-04-11 14:41 ` Jonathan Wakely
2012-04-11 17:13 ` Xinliang David Li
2012-04-11 19:30 ` Tobias Burnus
2012-04-11 20:44 ` Torvald Riegel
2012-04-13 23:48 ` Dave Korn
2012-04-13 23:37 ` Dave Korn
2012-04-10 17:48 ` DJ Delorie
2012-04-10 19:21 ` Dave Korn
2012-04-10 16:23 ` Xinliang David Li
2012-04-10 16:39 ` Jakub Jelinek
2012-04-10 16:43 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2012-04-10 16:47 ` Diego Novillo
2012-04-12 19:40 ` Tom Tromey
2012-04-12 19:42 ` Diego Novillo
2012-04-12 19:51 ` Tom Tromey
2012-04-10 17:37 ` Torvald Riegel
2012-04-10 21:39 ` Miles Bader
2012-04-10 22:32 ` Bernd Schmidt
2012-04-10 23:28 ` Eric Botcazou
2012-04-10 23:35 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2012-04-11 7:49 ` Eric Botcazou
2012-04-11 7:55 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2012-04-11 8:11 ` Eric Botcazou
2012-04-11 11:41 ` Jeff Law
2012-04-11 7:02 ` Jakub Jelinek
2012-04-11 7:46 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2012-04-11 7:51 ` Jakub Jelinek
2012-04-11 12:37 ` Bernd Schmidt
2012-04-11 12:47 ` Richard Guenther
2012-04-11 17:10 ` Xinliang David Li
2012-04-11 13:20 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2012-04-11 13:29 ` Jakub Jelinek
2012-04-11 13:44 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2012-04-11 14:45 ` David Edelsohn
2012-04-11 17:41 ` Xinliang David Li
2012-04-11 17:08 ` Xinliang David Li
2012-04-11 8:07 ` Eric Botcazou
2012-04-11 9:45 ` Richard Guenther
2012-04-10 17:54 ` Xinliang David Li
2012-04-11 12:44 ` Marek Polacek
2012-04-11 16:49 ` Xinliang David Li
2012-04-11 2:24 ` Lawrence Crowl
2012-04-11 9:43 ` Richard Guenther
2012-04-11 16:47 ` Xinliang David Li
2012-04-11 20:48 ` Paweł Sikora
2012-04-11 22:34 ` Lawrence Crowl
2012-04-12 9:28 ` Chiheng Xu
2012-04-12 10:30 ` Richard Guenther
2012-04-14 1:15 ` Chiheng Xu
2012-04-14 6:30 ` Chiheng Xu
2012-04-14 9:08 ` Robert Dewar
2012-04-14 10:38 ` Chiheng Xu
2012-04-14 11:06 ` Robert Dewar
2012-04-10 16:42 ` Paweł Sikora
2012-04-10 19:23 ` Dave Korn
2012-04-10 20:39 ` Andrew Pinski
2012-04-11 9:27 ` Richard Guenther
2012-04-11 1:01 ` Lawrence Crowl
2012-04-14 3:40 ` Chiheng Xu
2012-04-14 3:48 ` Chiheng Xu
2012-04-15 20:11 ` Chiheng Xu
2012-04-16 7:48 ` Duncan Sands
2012-04-16 9:23 ` Chiheng Xu
2012-04-16 18:53 ` Oleg Endo
2012-04-17 22:03 ` Chiheng Xu
2012-04-18 0:15 ` Oleg Endo
2012-04-10 11:14 ` Richard Guenther
2012-04-10 16:33 ` Xinliang David Li
2012-04-14 2:41 ` Chiheng Xu
2012-04-04 11:22 ` Diego Novillo
2012-04-04 7:07 ` Tristan Gingold
2012-04-04 13:13 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2012-04-04 13:32 ` Tristan Gingold
2012-04-04 14:37 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2012-04-04 14:52 ` Tristan Gingold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAFiYyc2jcg-mm+wV9foPcxH_vcUV1NEjmLkd-81szR78ivMSKQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=dnovillo@google.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gdr@integrable-solutions.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).