From: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Improving support for known testsuite failures
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 11:16:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc3wDoCi4MM1Vdan=Ztv+EPgA4NTyvAYcUfcDedooc-4SA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD_=9DQ7CaJc8HN9emsN7-7xiQBQFdwrbJ4mKevSWkHakBgrPw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 04:31, Richard Guenther
> <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I think it would be more useful to have a script parse gcc-testresults@
>> postings from the various autotesters and produce a nice webpage
>> with revisions and known FAIL/XPASSes for the target triplets that
>> are tested.
>
> Sure, though that describes a different tool. I'm after a tool that
> will 'exit 0' if the testsuite finished with nominal results.
Well, you'd need to maintain a list of known XPASS/FAILs anyway.
You can as well do it in the testcases themself (add XFAILs, remove
XPASSes and open bugreports to not forget about this). Adding
a separate filter or whatever just looks completely wrong to me.
>> Maybe you have some web-stuff-capable folks at Google even? ;)
>
> http://code.google.com/appengine/ ? ;)
Can't find the script that parses gcc-testresults there ;)
>
> Diego.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-08 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-07 15:28 Diego Novillo
2011-09-07 18:43 ` Andreas Jaeger
2011-09-07 19:57 ` Joseph S. Myers
2011-09-08 8:31 ` Richard Guenther
2011-09-08 11:05 ` Diego Novillo
2011-09-08 11:16 ` Richard Guenther [this message]
2011-09-08 11:34 ` Diego Novillo
2011-09-08 11:49 ` Richard Guenther
2011-09-08 12:14 ` Diego Novillo
2011-09-08 12:20 ` Richard Guenther
2011-09-08 12:26 ` Diego Novillo
2011-09-08 12:30 ` Richard Guenther
2011-09-08 12:33 ` Diego Novillo
2011-09-08 13:24 ` Richard Earnshaw
2011-09-08 13:55 ` Diego Novillo
2011-09-08 14:03 ` Richard Earnshaw
2011-09-08 16:41 ` Joseph S. Myers
2011-09-23 0:07 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2011-09-23 13:11 ` Diego Novillo
2011-09-08 16:39 ` Joseph S. Myers
2011-09-08 22:27 ` Michael Hope
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFiYyc3wDoCi4MM1Vdan=Ztv+EPgA4NTyvAYcUfcDedooc-4SA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=dnovillo@google.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).