From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-170116-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 19698 invoked by alias); 8 Sep 2011 11:16:38 -0000
Received: (qmail 19687 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Sep 2011 11:16:37 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-yi0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-yi0-f47.google.com) (209.85.218.47)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 11:16:20 +0000
Received: by yia28 with SMTP id 28so552117yia.20        for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 04:16:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.114.15 with SMTP id m15mr666465ybc.166.1315480579382; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 04:16:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.151.103.7 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 04:16:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAD_=9DQ7CaJc8HN9emsN7-7xiQBQFdwrbJ4mKevSWkHakBgrPw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20110907152813.GA28540@google.com>	<CAFiYyc2kziNeCaeuXJaO0dOvvHho45GOP-sH7BqV47Q1MxJJiA@mail.gmail.com>	<CAD_=9DQ7CaJc8HN9emsN7-7xiQBQFdwrbJ4mKevSWkHakBgrPw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 11:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc3wDoCi4MM1Vdan=Ztv+EPgA4NTyvAYcUfcDedooc-4SA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: Improving support for known testsuite failures
From: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-09/txt/msg00064.txt.bz2

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 04:31, Richard Guenther
> <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I think it would be more useful to have a script parse gcc-testresults@
>> postings from the various autotesters and produce a nice webpage
>> with revisions and known FAIL/XPASSes for the target triplets that
>> are tested.
>
> Sure, though that describes a different tool. =A0I'm after a tool that
> will 'exit 0' if the testsuite finished with nominal results.

Well, you'd need to maintain a list of known XPASS/FAILs anyway.
You can as well do it in the testcases themself (add XFAILs, remove
XPASSes and open bugreports to not forget about this).  Adding
a separate filter or whatever just looks completely wrong to me.

>> Maybe you have some web-stuff-capable folks at Google even? ;)
>
> http://code.google.com/appengine/ ? ;)

Can't find the script that parses gcc-testresults there ;)

>
> Diego.
>