From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ej1-x631.google.com (mail-ej1-x631.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::631]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99ADF385772C for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2023 17:39:21 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 99ADF385772C Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-ej1-x631.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-9786fc23505so143557966b.2 for ; Tue, 06 Jun 2023 10:39:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1686073160; x=1688665160; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=AtoRANG7LNp11t2FFCRqkMRK/dOqHC61W+McYR9h/Ys=; b=KHOOgG8AqVBR7NbkRV4NFPJmAfRr/tTN75XNULU41zKT/bir2CC3XAdZ9HHRaM9vqS J6URKwHmw0DjNn5i3grASvn3Ay11284x2Qhl3bwIBW9qMyNJdMtc76ekJdE9LSOfHBUC 0HjHiUlxsneAX2pjqUWml4WjI72uTrFiTdLZesxLec/k9xkqWysBYfDTlEwuaQCI0xJR /x58REVwbLYB2Kbt1tFsMrrLI22edZT9Zlzo9/RudGgtRr7S3Ml69UZkD4ozrSxX8piG /EUvuQg7kEv+xw6hkw0nWvhhAnfUALrVQImndDpxN4zMGHOHt91WDNi67BDs9OxqrKJV IJzA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1686073160; x=1688665160; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=AtoRANG7LNp11t2FFCRqkMRK/dOqHC61W+McYR9h/Ys=; b=B71f6F/fM20bmVUSjUqcqxDoC5ynpc1g3CHi+1PEdYhOPoydNbE/Z2gE4do8vyuYF9 +DVrKdciE8+fXcg+fUDhkHSXKlNRg/iYrT4G8JlGjH53FdMWx7aO0vetkz84NnVgV7Zg 31cZ+vTorfO4Zbsopb5du5hNEkjolbTTXKTg2akk5r4r36qIYu7Cu67uI6ShyRBOGnrb 2l1S5tPGYKrjeBbs5jzIX9yNcZ9QCBD0X23ceXUJ74+LTmzXST+1hStbqQMQ2P76vl8y MZRg3qbIrOjNOmJCqOhJHDv2FtL7C15KG6FEEdKGkbgk1zQuxu9OPd/NVeseJiUtJO5Q JGVQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwK10zEnbdeJHk/Of7l4m8WTNx6CaxqgLc5kp0UaFRVoch4gYTJ wEtOZM4tGtnr5bvaixbM/FCO5N5lEvlFFCLUvNJETeFU X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ6aPI7ZaBc7D4DkX3yXbyGEkwN4MSmkoyqv1NayGNY3PPczuoW6JZyLGxxTKuqIv1ojw/eT/1lUZY5eedsKQSc= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:98c:b0:96a:30b5:cfac with SMTP id bf12-20020a170907098c00b0096a30b5cfacmr3633665ejc.28.1686073159800; Tue, 06 Jun 2023 10:39:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <386a1d9c18eb7af15eef409c36a196ec0f99ad22.camel@mad-scientist.net> In-Reply-To: From: David Edelsohn Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 13:39:08 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Will GCC eventually learn to use BSR or even TZCNT on AMD/Intel processors? To: David Brown Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c15e4705fd797f4d" X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: --000000000000c15e4705fd797f4d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 11:38=E2=80=AFAM David Brown via Gcc wrote: > On 06/06/2023 14:53, Paul Smith wrote: > > On Tue, 2023-06-06 at 16:36 +0800, Julian Waters via Gcc wrote: > >> Sorry for my outburst, to the rest of this list. I can no longer stay > >> silent and watch these little shits bully people who are too kind to > >> fire back with the same kind of venom in their words. > > > > Many of us have had Dave in our killfiles for a long time already. I > > recommend you (and everyone else) do the same. You won't miss out on > > any information of any use to anyone: he apparently just enjoys making > > other people angry. > > > > I'm quite serious: it's so not worth the mental energy to even read his > > messages, much less to reply to him. Arguing with "people who are > > wrong on the internet" can be cathartic but this is not arguing, it's > > just stabbing yourself in the eye with a pencil. Don't play. > > > > If a poster is causing enough aggravation that a large number of people > have killfiled him, is there a process for banning him from the list? > That is surely a better solution than having many people individually > killfiling him? I would assume those with the power to blacklist > addresses from the mailing list do not do so lightly, and that there is > a procedure for it. > The GNU Toolchain leadership has blacklisted people in the past, but we have used the power sparingly. The behavior of the individual attracts attention, albeit negative, while not effectively accomplishing what he purports to desire. The recommended solution is to ignore the poster instead of trying to encourage him to communicate more effectively. Thanks, David --000000000000c15e4705fd797f4d--