From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 57204 invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2019 14:21:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 57196 invoked by uid 89); 20 Jun 2019 14:21:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*i:sk:7ff5851, H*f:sk:7ff5851 X-HELO: mail-wm1-f41.google.com Received: from mail-wm1-f41.google.com (HELO mail-wm1-f41.google.com) (209.85.128.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 14:21:29 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-f41.google.com with SMTP id u8so3383341wmm.1 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 07:21:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Xz6DfEssQ2O/mFvuVc17CNuKa0ZQODSRYZ7QbapzSQE=; b=HrFQ95FjpNGm9T3hRhXUMtSkW7F1oYloYmfMSihCqx3AYqK3wMZO40WJlF8egFKLB4 hwXpQ1D7zuB0B6vRwhbTuT+Nqtn2BktqCFcsCiJA8H1Jg8V5eoe9mzKiJ2A7CZPFhn/n 0kvMXtX+ZHUCPR86FMMErpeDpsrIJb4UNCOxyKSXJq5fKuzIqLtNKA0Gz5gvTV7dkL+/ 0Lvxxjjm867LPtMJV6g4f46yLG9pk/o3aO+sNaQN8e+pv0so49+FOO5cSjq7J4z/ItGJ 2fKpFNLN3P+vbrAXqXu/0bJxjZCiPLu1dzrt/bUaGJ6a8uZlZWFtM+jOoOTkPqiion8a LskQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <7ff58510-a641-4a33-be20-28118d3b0ee5@suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <7ff58510-a641-4a33-be20-28118d3b0ee5@suse.cz> From: David Edelsohn Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 14:21:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Dropping support of repo files (tlink) To: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=C5=A1ka?= Cc: GCC Development , Jan Hubicka Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-06/txt/msg00224.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 10:05 AM Martin Li=C5=A1ka wrote: > > Hi. > > In order to not buffer stderr output in LTO mode, I would like to remove > support for repo files (tlink). If I'm correctly it's only used by AIX > target. Would it be possible to drop that for the future? Is it even > used? AIX currently does not support GCC LTO, but the hope was that GCC would not do anything to specifically inhibit that ability to eventually support that feature. AIX currently needs collect2. I guess that AIX could try to find another mechanism when it adds support. Thanks, David