From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wr1-x42f.google.com (mail-wr1-x42f.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42f])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9BB93857C68
 for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 07:53:39 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org E9BB93857C68
Received: by mail-wr1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id a4so36576540wrr.2
 for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 00:53:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=1VMx2BeIHEj8DtN8l604Gl7RkQDU+kH+1tRKFGwuKAQ=;
 b=k0SM1RBKfFsWFuYk+WD9HZey0KxyYvMQetktHIQFgbC4KIUDIZ87Q4mf23f/Nl/NIh
 lOdYXV7Jry6iKC3HF2JlkLN9dKpdkPWdpYzzS7T/ZuIhF0CKC5iHgkht71EuDNJFuHxn
 MLf3lDFoUCyz+ZBICX3+1IFqqc6rs+8amJh11sBWzxRUf4xLXf7Qh2IfMPx3UCvWkb6z
 AZJDvPbO/auS098hX3iRCqyqwoUmsyiwHSBDdI3OYoeIsw5dvGJ+N/6jv1mDZj6w+v+7
 0hCfAF1PeWuFNlnqIxsGdtuEB/v8/l10Of3agCSVrHBcqaISgGzUEJ2xd8K3/GCe2KTR
 0piw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530zD1agQ7KIxxOb2sEtXd4Uwzpes9fIxRLtU7Xt5Y6x64UF16Tp
 JulB1I+gppBvyU9S3KUnq1GiDLaQDkRFvkQyZFU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwjVw/BIIbmRblQm+0gKJPtBAimW5Ym+zbkwYon/p9V/+pQtg6RFSrolaq+eUfqxN0KPUKu+KguzuSWsmGDtF8=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:fdcd:: with SMTP id i13mr18651943wrs.185.1618905219025; 
 Tue, 20 Apr 2021 00:53:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2104141745340.94016@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
 <20210415134907.GA51340@thyrsus.com>
 <96db05d78cb1f829d0b3ce3026ac15a335fffd41.camel@redhat.com>
 <3e0b8d933eef3eb7f12e86bf6bc92dec6965065d.camel@silogroup.org>
 <CAKOQZ8y=tJK2qrANA_e-iEq35hu6wBONFFXUaz6YxEThmOyszw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOOE185MDNL.J37YAGWX988I@klugetown>
 <40f0e05b-3156-a649-b636-c90b8b8e0f8@pfeifer.com>
 <4A7DE074-9600-4513-A05C-566926D447BE@tesio.it>
 <535f1dcf-2258-c817-cf72-5c49dc9e5823@hesbynett.no>
 <CAKOQZ8wqh3xY0nH_pAaycdykzwNCCeoVHiZ0UgqPX_RNiMgW3g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20210418131052.GB320802@thyrsus.com>
 <92c014fc39022ea03c6c801bb76ab39674e8a6fb.camel@redhat.com>
 <CAH6eHdTJwiPAweDC5bMaJd5qD5SVe0AnSHKSDFEGZNeVWckU0w@mail.gmail.com>
 <or4kg3pclk.fsf@lxoliva.fsfla.org> <CARASROFIMAG.3FXB91YLS7GUV@klugetown>
 <CAH6eHdRcEBWybrAUV3f5FmgZqSm4UrAX==6dKtWPmrJqbyZYAg@mail.gmail.com>
 <542eb0298a485953602e0f28f94b9f03@appliantology.com>
 <CAS8RJUDO44Z.24QC87DO4SOCA@klugetown>
In-Reply-To: <CAS8RJUDO44Z.24QC87DO4SOCA@klugetown>
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 08:53:27 +0100
Message-ID: <CAH6eHdQ2DdWdhGK3M6W+zKuqE86+gQ-vG3=HcPL321yFFSPs6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: removing toxic emailers
To: Frosku <frosku@frosku.com>
Cc: Thomas Rodgers <rodgert@appliantology.com>,
 Jonathan Wakely via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
 SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc mailing list <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc>,
 <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc>,
 <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 07:53:50 -0000

On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 at 04:47, Frosku <frosku@frosku.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon Apr 19, 2021 at 4:06 PM BST, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
> > Google doesn't pay anybody to work on GCC all day. You know nothing
> > about
> > GCC or the "problems" you're complaining about. Your input to this
> > conversation is not constructive.
>
> This feels like that moment in 8Mile, "pay attention, you're saying the
> same shit that he said." The personal insults and technical semantic
> arguments are testament to the fact that you're not willing or not able
> to argue the points. It's quite incredible that two people have replied
> to the same multiple-hundred word e-mail about a broad issue of trying
> to gatekeep discussion and both have focused on semantics ("it's not
> *all* day"). I will remember not to use hyperbole in future for fear of
> it being taken literally and used as an excuse to dodge the point.

Check the git logs, Google employees are minor contributors these
days. The GPLv3 scared Google away from GCC years ago.

I've unsubscribed from this list now, so please stop CCing me. I'm not
interested in continuing this.