* Patch Resend
@ 2019-01-07 15:42 nick
2019-01-07 15:44 ` Jonathan Wakely
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: nick @ 2019-01-07 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: GCC Development
Greetings All,
I was wondering as I sent a patch before the holidays if I should resend it
as I did not get any replies.
Thanks,
Nick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Patch Resend
2019-01-07 15:42 Patch Resend nick
@ 2019-01-07 15:44 ` Jonathan Wakely
2019-01-07 15:51 ` nick
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Wakely @ 2019-01-07 15:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nick; +Cc: GCC Development
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 15:42, nick wrote:
>
> Greetings All,
>
> I was wondering as I sent a patch before the holidays if I should resend it
> as I did not get any replies.
Which patch? I don't see any patch from you that didn't get some replies.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Patch Resend
2019-01-07 15:44 ` Jonathan Wakely
@ 2019-01-07 15:51 ` nick
2019-01-07 15:54 ` Jonathan Wakely
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: nick @ 2019-01-07 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Wakely; +Cc: GCC Development
On 2019-01-07 10:44 a.m., Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 15:42, nick wrote:
>>
>> Greetings All,
>>
>> I was wondering as I sent a patch before the holidays if I should resend it
>> as I did not get any replies.
>
> Which patch? I don't see any patch from you that didn't get some replies.
>
Sorry this is what I was talking about it's a fix for a bad patch:
This fixes the bug id, 71176 to use the proper known
code print formatter type, %lu for size_t rather than
%d which is considered best pratice for print statements.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com>
---
fixincludes/fixincl.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fixincludes/fixincl.c b/fixincludes/fixincl.c
index 6dba2f6e830..5b8b77a77f0 100644
--- a/fixincludes/fixincl.c
+++ b/fixincludes/fixincl.c
@@ -158,11 +158,11 @@ main (int argc, char** argv)
if (VLEVEL( VERB_PROGRESS )) {
tSCC zFmt[] =
"\
-Processed %5d files containing %d bytes \n\
+Processed %5d files containing %lu bytes \n\
Applying %5d fixes to %d files\n\
Altering %5d of them\n";
- fprintf (stderr, zFmt, process_ct, ttl_data_size, apply_ct,
+ fprintf (stderr, zFmt, process_ct, (unsigned int long) ttl_data_size, apply_ct,
fixed_ct, altered_ct);
}
#endif /* DO_STATS */
--
2.17.1
Nick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Patch Resend
2019-01-07 15:51 ` nick
@ 2019-01-07 15:54 ` Jonathan Wakely
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Wakely @ 2019-01-07 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nick; +Cc: GCC Development
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 15:51, nick <xerofoify@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2019-01-07 10:44 a.m., Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 15:42, nick wrote:
> >>
> >> Greetings All,
> >>
> >> I was wondering as I sent a patch before the holidays if I should resend it
> >> as I did not get any replies.
> >
> > Which patch? I don't see any patch from you that didn't get some replies.
> >
> Sorry this is what I was talking about it's a fix for a bad patch:
Ah yes thanks, I see it now, at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-12/msg01511.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-01-07 15:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-01-07 15:42 Patch Resend nick
2019-01-07 15:44 ` Jonathan Wakely
2019-01-07 15:51 ` nick
2019-01-07 15:54 ` Jonathan Wakely
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).