From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24399 invoked by alias); 24 Sep 2019 22:09:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24389 invoked by uid 89); 24 Sep 2019 22:09:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=nearly, decade, ts, price X-HELO: mail-wr1-f43.google.com Received: from mail-wr1-f43.google.com (HELO mail-wr1-f43.google.com) (209.85.221.43) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 22:09:21 +0000 Received: by mail-wr1-f43.google.com with SMTP id a11so3850950wrx.1 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 15:09:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8AlskWR9Lk0V4D4NCZ2pnA6keOEttlAkntux5lP2AHQ=; b=IlEMnxLnnLLeWQ65rchvrbvb/7KGvqj9vv077XXeT+32IMxnoP4MW+Y7F4yO8fiezi JVsqJNUELt5C5MP4IaWWWrAaLLASbNCN44PFonKOe2T5Ft12YkhKNRu3FXR1EwK46BvH IgOFuTUCHHR6I6NO9IPVpnLOsNCikoyQfEpuqD7DXigweVkh0TCuyQOimPhTOr4qzhtN I4jW8Uqvd5wq4iR3jxU7+EySgn6V5Of+RJ+KOkTmxB0+97uWiXqGiGV3lqe0Gt9dJZdz Oj1IHEdYphSEUEPcdjkxvxfDLnXt1g3K99yn2SCvI2419vCyRNTY0Y4VM46HiXWRBFi4 DWOA== MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Jonathan Wakely Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 22:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: git conversion of GCC wwwdocs repository To: Joseph Myers Cc: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-09/txt/msg00215.txt.bz2 On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 21:46, Joseph Myers wrote: > > Would anyone like to make any comments on this conversion from CVS to git? It looks pretty good. I note that the author map just uses the committer's current email address, meaning I have commits using my @redhat.com address nearly a decade before I started working at Red Hat. But that's a small price to pay for moving from CVS to Git in my opinion. And t's arguably correct to have all my commits under one identity rather than several different ones anyway.