From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=OUbh=BA=gmail.com=jwakely.gcc@sourceware.org>
Received: from mail-ed1-x52f.google.com (mail-ed1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52f])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1236385773E
	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 11 May 2023 08:53:47 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org B1236385773E
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com
Received: by mail-ed1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-50bd37ca954so77061206a12.0
        for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 11 May 2023 01:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1683795226; x=1686387226;
        h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=2LIoIV4aQuC/+98JXRhn0OtULgVr7hv7E3eojT57SUg=;
        b=sW1nzQUBT3YNATzUr6gM+wHMXaBqa9vtcU1FRvmwdtSVSYf1TmA7Y+pQhvTMP3ZfKc
         Vx8C7g6vau6XrsjoXMF/ogHLVu5FbM2ouQVXpGh5sTf5t6oiNNfsDqEWzcuuHOeW0lQg
         QdonEDeHbtPeZju1DH4jdzRj/PBUNkIgf5Ta/hcFU1A+O85JfH5Va+sIXApXJGnMGZXD
         eXk1sxHqeglNjbLNrrlQ0Jxb8b2rNMSqeCru8WTJ87v2s6DRNeSCI2L23ZkI7VwhyUZv
         V4P1FffblU5t7uryZy+SacGYS54P8eQ86kIZQeQVRL2Ww1VrebjhRj2Z2WdYAcS1mSW6
         F5hg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1683795226; x=1686387226;
        h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
         :reply-to;
        bh=2LIoIV4aQuC/+98JXRhn0OtULgVr7hv7E3eojT57SUg=;
        b=Z8BnewTR+WZcjseATA9LUjOk38FytDkhhif6Q65usTa0II6DtLgos4i4DHVhrnxE37
         Xbq9tfHSuxcKv325ZV8yoqIblIJJRojOwp4LZ/AYPH0DYMTdkpe22bB73CLU7K4EbW/o
         qsCgWB/tHuijSdjW3ZkLn3R1OLrT7uURoYf6SeUfoWDEoNkzSakq2ODmOIMXuadht9ao
         bLU/T4gn4AA4YbJHNyhxoTNY7tbhu32Y0cMEL1IAnWv0w1+t3FLyoa+buonWAgy5E8p5
         2iVlSH4dsJSdFB44LvMwNFVXYtp5kkzT3PToPVWY0q52N74xsj5jXoYZHc0E+L/DP54B
         MGMg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDxTXRyuSdTZ/hBzb99DC404lJwQluTu+wPd1S2Y9Y+sDo5jVRMe
	kEb0YgA12mtFJwxi3LSQ1mKTy55dq8x9kT8YJ0QrS5XFwFc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5+ttiaagxJ5xKeP4duxRvO0ESHqX700WFtT4dTeZwQnE9y9O4EfYI874tbzw38y+XmykfdnADitT8Pn0RMbHU=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:27d2:b0:506:71bd:3931 with SMTP id
 c18-20020a05640227d200b0050671bd3931mr19032846ede.2.1683795226202; Thu, 11
 May 2023 01:53:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <877cth66qb.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <CAGWvnykoEtT0BQtuN70DN6tWohtf=Mm7SW55psZvVmj3OvKUEg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAH6eHdS5=AED+7MSe0prr8CZ-sYqnD159OjhTp9=R-a0aBZ3qw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20230509102201.6aa2a7d14fdb2f1e7abff449@killthe.net> <87r0rp5uf8.fsf@aarsen.me>
 <83ttwla1ep.fsf@gnu.org> <CAH6eHdS-7USHzX3rPJaR66sEdjG+-nHp7mDb0gD7ceBnp+Fmpg@mail.gmail.com>
 <83lehx9vix.fsf@gnu.org> <ZFqZ25xKm4w4IkqF@tucnak> <83fs859unu.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87y1lx1avj.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <83ednoapb6.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CAH6eHdS0KEyfLdE9fvTJ3aLtudKXcL9PyqPASJJVEgTMD6FaUQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <875y8zegnc.fsf@yahoo.com> <865y8zmi08.fsf@aarsen.me> <87bkirclqv.fsf@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <87bkirclqv.fsf@yahoo.com>
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 09:53:35 +0100
Message-ID: <CAH6eHdQHEtyk8H_M4vwC0=hNg8TbKpLHd_qTd_ZuOn-M8EvXMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: More C type errors by default for GCC 14
To: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>
Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Arsen_Arsenovi=C4=87?= <arsen@aarsen.me>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>

On Thu, 11 May 2023 at 09:31, Po Lu wrote:
>   (BTW, I thought implicit int was being discussed, not implicit
>    function declarations, but here goes.)

Then you're not paying attention, the very first mail in the thread
starts by saying:

TL;DR: This message is about turning implicit-int,
implicit-function-declaration, and possibly int-conversion into errors
for GCC 14.

Please educate yourself about the topic.