* unreachable intro to gcc page linked to on readings page @ 2022-08-07 8:33 Van Ly 2022-08-24 11:41 ` Jonathan Wakely 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Van Ly @ 2022-08-07 8:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc Hello, On the readings page . https://gcc.gnu.org/readings.html a broken link points to An introduction to GCC by Brian J. Gough. . http://www.network-theory.co.uk/gcc/intro/ which has a copy at . https://web.archive.org/web/20060106062936/http://www.network-theory.co.uk/gcc/intro/ -- vl ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: unreachable intro to gcc page linked to on readings page 2022-08-07 8:33 unreachable intro to gcc page linked to on readings page Van Ly @ 2022-08-24 11:41 ` Jonathan Wakely 2022-08-29 10:31 ` Gerald Pfeifer 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Jonathan Wakely @ 2022-08-24 11:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Van Ly; +Cc: gcc, Gerald Pfeifer On Sun, 7 Aug 2022 at 09:33, Van Ly via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > > Hello, > > On the readings page > > . https://gcc.gnu.org/readings.html > > a broken link points to > > An introduction to GCC by Brian J. Gough. > . http://www.network-theory.co.uk/gcc/intro/ > > which has a copy at > > . https://web.archive.org/web/20060106062936/http://www.network-theory.co.uk/gcc/intro/ Thanks for letting us know. There are much more recent archived copies like https://web.archive.org/web/20181113021321/http://www.network-theory.co.uk/gcc/intro/ I'm not sure it's worth updating the link to an archived copy of that page, because all the links for buying a PDF or printed copy are probably dead now anyway. We could link to https://archive.org/details/B-001-002-835 instead, or to the archived HTML version. The newest capture of the HTML version seems to be this, although I didn't check that all pages are archived: https://web.archive.org/web/20181206025406/http://www.network-theory.co.uk/docs/gccintro/ My preference would be to link to that latter. Although it's quite dated, the sections on basic compilation and compiler flags are still relevant for beginners. Gerald? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: unreachable intro to gcc page linked to on readings page 2022-08-24 11:41 ` Jonathan Wakely @ 2022-08-29 10:31 ` Gerald Pfeifer 2022-09-01 11:01 ` [wwwdocs] " Jonathan Wakely 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Gerald Pfeifer @ 2022-08-29 10:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jonathan Wakely; +Cc: Van Ly, gcc On Wed, 24 Aug 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> a broken link points to >> >> An introduction to GCC by Brian J. Gough. >> . http://www.network-theory.co.uk/gcc/intro/ > There are much more recent archived copies like > https://web.archive.org/web/20181113021321/http://www.network-theory.co.uk/gcc/intro/ > I'm not sure it's worth updating the link to an archived copy of that > page, because all the links for buying a PDF or printed copy are > probably dead now anyway. > > We could link to https://archive.org/details/B-001-002-835 instead, or > to the archived HTML version. The newest capture of the HTML version > seems to be this, although I didn't check that all pages are archived: > https://web.archive.org/web/20181206025406/http://www.network-theory.co.uk/docs/gccintro/ > My preference would be to link to that latter. Although it's quite > dated, the sections on basic compilation and compiler flags are still > relevant for beginners. > > Gerald? I searched around a bit myself (since indeed the original and printed versions seem to be gone) and landed at https://archive.org/details/B-001-002-835 as well. I probably would have gone for that, though the web.archive.org/web link you found works equally if you want to point there instead. Gerald (who appears in the Acknowledgement section of that book :-) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [wwwdocs] Re: unreachable intro to gcc page linked to on readings page 2022-08-29 10:31 ` Gerald Pfeifer @ 2022-09-01 11:01 ` Jonathan Wakely 2022-09-21 9:32 ` Jonathan Wakely 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Jonathan Wakely @ 2022-09-01 11:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Gerald Pfeifer; +Cc: Van Ly, gcc, gcc-patches [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1436 bytes --] On Mon, 29 Aug 2022 at 11:31, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Aug 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > >> a broken link points to > >> > >> An introduction to GCC by Brian J. Gough. > >> . http://www.network-theory.co.uk/gcc/intro/ > > There are much more recent archived copies like > > https://web.archive.org/web/20181113021321/http://www.network-theory.co.uk/gcc/intro/ > > I'm not sure it's worth updating the link to an archived copy of that > > page, because all the links for buying a PDF or printed copy are > > probably dead now anyway. > > > > We could link to https://archive.org/details/B-001-002-835 instead, or > > to the archived HTML version. The newest capture of the HTML version > > seems to be this, although I didn't check that all pages are archived: > > https://web.archive.org/web/20181206025406/http://www.network-theory.co.uk/docs/gccintro/ > > My preference would be to link to that latter. Although it's quite > > dated, the sections on basic compilation and compiler flags are still > > relevant for beginners. > > > > Gerald? > > I searched around a bit myself (since indeed the original and printed > versions seem to be gone) and landed at > > https://archive.org/details/B-001-002-835 > > as well. I probably would have gone for that, though the > web.archive.org/web link you found works equally if you want to point > there instead. Why not both? I've pushed the attached patch to [wwwdocs]. [-- Attachment #2: patch.txt --] [-- Type: text/plain, Size: 849 bytes --] commit 0e4c9a39789b6dbcd44b2e0d4a42b5885d3bddb2 Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com> Date: Thu Sep 1 10:57:46 2022 +0100 Replace stale link to the "An Introduction to GCC" book diff --git a/htdocs/readings.html b/htdocs/readings.html index 4269e9f0..5d1b78e8 100644 --- a/htdocs/readings.html +++ b/htdocs/readings.html @@ -22,8 +22,9 @@ <ul> - <li><a href="http://www.network-theory.co.uk/gcc/intro/">An Introduction - to GCC</a> by Brian J. Gough.</li> + <li><a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20060106062936/http://www.network-theory.co.uk/gcc/intro/">An Introduction + to GCC</a> by Brian J. Gough + (<a href="https://archive.org/details/B-001-002-835/">e-book</a>).</li> <li><a href="https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/GNU_C_Compiler_Internals">GNU C Compiler Internals (Wikibook)</a>, numerous contributors.</li> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [wwwdocs] Re: unreachable intro to gcc page linked to on readings page 2022-09-01 11:01 ` [wwwdocs] " Jonathan Wakely @ 2022-09-21 9:32 ` Jonathan Wakely 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Jonathan Wakely @ 2022-09-21 9:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Gerald Pfeifer; +Cc: Van Ly, gcc, gcc-patches [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1731 bytes --] On Thu, 1 Sept 2022 at 12:01, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Aug 2022 at 11:31, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > > > On Wed, 24 Aug 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > >> a broken link points to > > >> > > >> An introduction to GCC by Brian J. Gough. > > >> . http://www.network-theory.co.uk/gcc/intro/ > > > There are much more recent archived copies like > > > https://web.archive.org/web/20181113021321/http://www.network-theory.co.uk/gcc/intro/ > > > I'm not sure it's worth updating the link to an archived copy of that > > > page, because all the links for buying a PDF or printed copy are > > > probably dead now anyway. > > > > > > We could link to https://archive.org/details/B-001-002-835 instead, or > > > to the archived HTML version. The newest capture of the HTML version > > > seems to be this, although I didn't check that all pages are archived: > > > https://web.archive.org/web/20181206025406/http://www.network-theory.co.uk/docs/gccintro/ > > > My preference would be to link to that latter. Although it's quite > > > dated, the sections on basic compilation and compiler flags are still > > > relevant for beginners. > > > > > > Gerald? > > > > I searched around a bit myself (since indeed the original and printed > > versions seem to be gone) and landed at > > > > https://archive.org/details/B-001-002-835 > > > > as well. I probably would have gone for that, though the > > web.archive.org/web link you found works equally if you want to point > > there instead. > > Why not both? I've pushed the attached patch to [wwwdocs]. Oops, I meant to link to the HTML pages, not the promotional page for the printed version and PDF. Fixed with the attached tweak, pushed to wwwdocs. [-- Attachment #2: patch.txt --] [-- Type: text/plain, Size: 822 bytes --] commit a962fbb84d1a05af682f35f5b6dad7e3371db308 Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com> Date: Wed Sep 21 09:34:57 2022 +0100 Adjust "An Introduction to GCC" link to the actual book I meant to link to the HTML pages, not the promotional page for the printed version and PDF. diff --git a/htdocs/readings.html b/htdocs/readings.html index 5d1b78e8..3abdd2c4 100644 --- a/htdocs/readings.html +++ b/htdocs/readings.html @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ <ul> - <li><a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20060106062936/http://www.network-theory.co.uk/gcc/intro/">An Introduction + <li><a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20060106062936/http://www.network-theory.co.uk/docs/gccintro/">An Introduction to GCC</a> by Brian J. Gough (<a href="https://archive.org/details/B-001-002-835/">e-book</a>).</li> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-09-21 9:32 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2022-08-07 8:33 unreachable intro to gcc page linked to on readings page Van Ly 2022-08-24 11:41 ` Jonathan Wakely 2022-08-29 10:31 ` Gerald Pfeifer 2022-09-01 11:01 ` [wwwdocs] " Jonathan Wakely 2022-09-21 9:32 ` Jonathan Wakely
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).