From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com (mail-wr1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::436]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 355373858C3A for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 12:29:16 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 355373858C3A Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id i22so8101481wrb.13 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 04:29:16 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Z01tKddZuCv2Ew5F4RT/chAt/0ERTb8Mo39w6Jk7Y80=; b=XpWL5t0X2C1YmCP2lIyQXQjJn1+IrKJZZfPOpMm4tenXsgi0NMEkZu/vfo33irSPBg FB5MvOrH4V27y62cG/feM14qxDbc6Ox3jT+nJWvuWGi1THRnksISAyQmU0ytpr+EbKjQ GgqYgEWN69RNwbhVHef2IxnUbZ3km0iHfxRvpYK7Y1i3XUf4ub2rg2wUev5dyCxeyjNv a9IU0kkjzdbH2w0Z+4cVMkYR4S5KRJYXVauCGlHBw3TUMjVhnOm5kIZdqtlv0fdgckJe 7KT+YO4pPuXSNK/uSvL+vhPCKbixbmOunIALabzHXKreeGjTIxPf+5MzlsXL0FKoS4XH QkmA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531bxTc4h833Poev7Ig9cnoKuXYvS8AoX66BpJLfbjV+Q+udkX6J ggkrIbLokbN6atOYn0vBbiUvkaoj4H7vdWtSsOQysCK3 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwerZ2xKIY+Ci05IT51b1xFz0S/jP+4OZyGunypRUgjl3ui34+P5xWFUXI4/+67wEZGRwRcxpyWnfgVwFhWPnA= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:64c6:: with SMTP id f6mr4199506wri.568.1639571355386; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 04:29:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2f461e1e-f325-9dd6-f0e4-6ea0f9b734a8@mentor.com> In-Reply-To: <2f461e1e-f325-9dd6-f0e4-6ea0f9b734a8@mentor.com> From: Jonathan Wakely Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 12:29:04 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Labelling of regressions in Bugzilla To: Tobias Burnus Cc: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_SHORT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 12:29:18 -0000 On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 at 12:22, Tobias Burnus wrote: > > On 15.12.21 12:39, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote: > > > Iain pointed out a drawback of not having the regression info in the > > Summary. Currently it does draw your attention when looking at the > > results of a bugzilla search. Andrew noted that bug aliases are > > automatically added to the summary, e.g. https://gcc.gnu.org/PR94404 > > shows its alias "(c++core-issues)". > Wouldn't it be easier to click on the "[Change Columns]" button at the > bottom of the search result page and add the new field to the "Selected > Columns"? The known-to-(work/fail) columns are available, i.e. this > feature also works with custom fields. Yes, I'd be fine with that solution (thanks, for the reminder, I should have mentioned that option in my initial mail). If you reorder the "known to fail" column so it comes right before the Summary column you would get a clear list of regressions shown before the rest of the summary (and nothing in that column for non-regressions). A possible downside is that would show all the branches the regression was on, including closed ones. Again, I'd be fine with that, but it's a change from the info visible at a glance in the Summary today.