From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14724 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2011 09:43:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 14671 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Jul 2011 09:43:55 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-pz0-f49.google.com (HELO mail-pz0-f49.google.com) (209.85.210.49) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:43:39 +0000 Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so71100pzk.36 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 02:43:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.97.26 with SMTP id z26mr3858368wfl.81.1311155018434; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 02:43:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.103.17 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 02:43:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:02:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: PATCH RFA: Build stages 2 and 3 with C++ From: Jonathan Wakely To: David Edelsohn Cc: Ian Lance Taylor , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00375.txt.bz2 On 20 July 2011 09:35, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 20 July 2011 02:14, David Edelsohn wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrot= e: >> >>> I got agreement from two global reviewers and no objections. >>> >>> I have committed this patch. >>> >>> Please let me know about any problems. >> >> This also breaks bootstrap on AIX. =A0I cannot debug further at the >> moment because of a separate problem with the infrastructure at IBM, >> but I receive the following error during the first build of libstdc++: >> >> In file included from /farm/dje/src/src/libstdc++-v3/src/debug.cc:30:0: >> /tmp/20110719/powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/safe_loc= al_iterator.h:91:50: >> error: 'size_t' has not been declared > > Hmm, that should possibly be using std::size_t instead. =A0We ensure > std::size_t has been declared by the library, but not necessarily > ::size_t Paolo has committed a change to that code, does it help the AIX bootstrap i= ssue?