From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-x32d.google.com (mail-wm1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32d]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7564E385DC0F for ; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 22:25:08 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 7564E385DC0F Received: by mail-wm1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id t14-20020a05600c198eb029020c8aac53d4so14945423wmq.1 for ; Wed, 07 Jul 2021 15:25:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hhN5XeDxmLMh0p+mlnFX9abB7cD1ThyuxuHZjUmVt4w=; b=sg6+03LKuIY0NxP4fN+h9uKy8aBUzfd05kxMviZjRJPuv7lN6XsA6FRC4rFzfr7aH4 mVscr7oDKSvfyMbT/dYowHyWNtYH3bYzXs0pjmIfpz3zdFiR2Gts1nV83SA1Gqe3O3I2 iZI3o1obhcWNIqLXGw0t3GxEIqCcpDyGFimQgU6ELpV0WIKc0O1fwhLPmGb/qNh5YZnw EN7RsbG5cgdEe6pHUE2YhTL5UnH6reh4I7ykgsU3duyzKiFBxA0WmnO/ApK8NkE0OpbC 3dHqSxTGp+bGnEVjQRull3MJKq/kfwLsLX/pVRh+X1ioX7QN74ZQo25q/HyUzjdDXnab W7JQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532xurArxbqfAO90V53VSRsz2MU99i3H+Okg0LX5IhP2MybI8sSV 5tcTHFRaU38bvWPJs/zbSd5ClgYD0RYl1uxO1yU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyjLAxqgdvBNORl5EDV05BBFDECUoY9AnRqG6Zwoiy95WlLRh4EM48acSuOnnzApM9cXv7apsJIHVTf6hL+yG0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3b0b:: with SMTP id m11mr29609256wms.162.1625696707514; Wed, 07 Jul 2021 15:25:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <9121724e-e741-9bad-a39d-d6ac49422589@gmail.com> <734e36bd-5adb-feed-7e89-d63d233198a4@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <734e36bd-5adb-feed-7e89-d63d233198a4@gmail.com> From: Jonathan Wakely Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 23:24:56 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: where is PRnnnn required again? To: Martin Sebor Cc: Marek Polacek , gcc mailing list X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2021 22:25:09 -0000 On Wed, 7 Jul 2021, 23:18 Martin Sebor, wrote: > On 7/7/21 3:53 PM, Marek Polacek wrote: > > I'm not sure why you keep hitting so many issues; git addlog takes care > of > > this stuff for me and I've had no trouble pushing my patches. Is there > > a reason you don't use it also? > > I probably have a completely different workflow. Git addlog isn't > a git command (is it some sort of a GCC extension?), and what I put > in the subject of my emails is almost never the same thing as what > I put in the commit message. Why not? Why is it useful to write two different explanations of the patch?