From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21435 invoked by alias); 30 Oct 2011 13:48:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 21425 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Oct 2011 13:48:36 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ww0-f51.google.com (HELO mail-ww0-f51.google.com) (74.125.82.51) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 13:48:21 +0000 Received: by wwf27 with SMTP id 27so153370wwf.8 for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 06:48:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.229.14 with SMTP id g14mr3245550weq.6.1319982500369; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 06:48:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.90.19 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 06:48:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20110921182543.GA31859@synopsys.com> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 14:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: C++11 no longer experimental From: Jonathan Wakely To: Gerald Pfeifer Cc: Joe Buck , Jason Merrill , Nathan Ridge , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00536.txt.bz2 On 30 October 2011 13:14, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > @@ -9,11 +9,11 @@ > =A0 > > =A0 > - =A0

C++0x Support in GCC

> + =A0

C++0x/C++11 Support in GCC

> > - =A0

C++0x is the working name of the next ISO C++ standard, due by > - =A0the end of this decade, which introduces a host of new features into > - =A0the standard C++ language and library. This project seeks to > + =A0

C++0x was the working name of a new ISO C++ standard, which then > + =A0was released in 2011 as C++11 and introduces a host of new features > + =A0into the standard C++ language and library. This project seeks to > =A0 implement new C++0x features in GCC and to make it one of the first > =A0 compilers to bring C++0x to C++ programmers.

Just a small point of style: I think "which was then released" reads a bit more naturally than "which then was released"