From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30C5B3857031 for ; Fri, 26 May 2023 12:23:54 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 30C5B3857031 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: from mail-ej1-x62a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::62a]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q2WU4-0000Wc-JJ for gcc@gnu.org; Fri, 26 May 2023 08:23:53 -0400 Received: by mail-ej1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-96f5685f902so93875266b.2 for ; Fri, 26 May 2023 05:23:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1685103831; x=1687695831; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=AH6kfLm5U1jlAFJ+rTaokclw0Z6dbEPzz5SvvBWX0So=; b=aGyuDm8DhVCWHlPrRfaezyX8lenieYLG8gylBbirZdnt5uB0gmoIKdV/aPgUX5hrRV D3n3niEV7muN2bwlMqUAlLg8+KD+/PFHksoJAI0pOf309OgwaIrL+GogOhRN7zpughs/ Tlb6uTlt82OI+gSzetgYaLUR+4+zsD0SDbz9Eu0df5TUTJTqtEBy6TrK9aVOdA1b+4Z2 3L6UdMpIWMOH3jN675cw3UE65AtzAjnfiM4k2VHxelftndaNUP1p04whkGdxxylWNuno 6bkuSuxaPweN7OyRxXpvSyz7u+legLe4rEY7WTsPiCc1+Hin7AcIhpTrJY/TQr5zmzV/ 7zLg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1685103831; x=1687695831; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=AH6kfLm5U1jlAFJ+rTaokclw0Z6dbEPzz5SvvBWX0So=; b=bUi5LVH+YotXsNUg9iU6kW1hBEklkDnBoTOTIReAC1yC3tx97TSfL+p8mQ0EfdYmCK u5F2zsB9RR0mMILYQEEVVU10bFfl8DOKPNVQkAOYFQlvoptAggAxzNqioqb7r2iOy18f OnvN6UYrCsiqtUgNtgOniYrt4kdHuLnWXUrKLNIgq5IqPQruBfG6S7EGQwV3VBmJAnZ2 sY+3O9d+Eooj/BD3t+RSCsEFw/34bMyeYDhtcIMnuTXN8jAzw94c4w6cWfgdC0oMbULm RRp9GVhSKdO8DfXuAI5J+oBCo1Ow6DGJgvO9BEIuVoIgGy7PiV9Ui2seMK2qaY28xMrd bgqg== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwf9JRpAm0huHqTt9gfrT7t0wDpivxxmItZoyKBmyk5w8O3ZALV 8uLyC4LH3mzfuihfkvQORpbl6A+bYudKM1twm68= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ7rESgjpPjV+l3NffyCcfSrFuUoK/oPTIGzq0DF1dU/fV7xbYQ0TW2VVeUqDoaI7mUvyBjFMnxbmGtcvU4Xurg= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7e92:b0:969:dda1:38a4 with SMTP id qb18-20020a1709077e9200b00969dda138a4mr1843160ejc.38.1685103830726; Fri, 26 May 2023 05:23:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <51071A92918346ABBC6B5703179F5174@H270> <896EB515110646CEBAA84E98E273E4B8@H270> <4BD5D8BA8E0F45098CC3E2B188A216E6@H270> <7D6327CDEBFD4331B6FFBD67E4B514FD@H270> <07FDB7C375CD46C1B6955B66338DD58E@H270> In-Reply-To: <07FDB7C375CD46C1B6955B66338DD58E@H270> From: Jonathan Wakely Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 13:23:39 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Will GCC eventually support SSE2 or SSE4.1? To: Stefan Kanthak Cc: Jakub Jelinek , gcc@gnu.org, Andrew Pinski Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::62a; envelope-from=jwakely.gcc@gmail.com; helo=mail-ej1-x62a.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9,DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,DKIM_VALID=-0.1,DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,SPF_PASS=-0.001,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_SOFTFAIL,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Fri, 26 May 2023 at 13:09, Stefan Kanthak wrote: > > "Jonathan Wakely" wrote: > > > On Fri, 26 May 2023 at 12:29, Stefan Kanthak wrote: > >> > >> "Jakub Jelinek" wrote: > >> > If you aren't able to read the documentation, it is hard to argue. > >> > >> When the documentation is wrong or incomplete it's hard to trust it! > > > > Just like when you make incorrect statements and assume everybody else is wrong. > > Do I assume that? Or did you just make this up? Your initial email in this thread, and examples on your silly webpage, assume that -mtune=i386 or -mtune=core2 or -mtune=native will control the instruction set used. Which isn't how it works. You didn't read the docs, or you read them and assumed you knew better. And your charming "REALITY CHECK please!" about -march=core2 which turned out to be, again, because you don't know what you're talking about. I would suggest that you fix the silly webpage, but it doesn't really matter because nobody's going to take it seriously. Have fun being rude and wrong.