From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wr1-x429.google.com (mail-wr1-x429.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::429])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83303385828D
 for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 12:21:38 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 83303385828D
Received: by mail-wr1-x429.google.com with SMTP id w17so3539432wrg.7
 for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 05:21:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=AWOSRg8VWZYLkPSUJEcTgKL5HMN2lx41DOHUE1dGLCg=;
 b=lDVGd2rV9Ngas0rEqZny3oGvwBI2Qjr4HIWvHO/DUKHc5Q8MqyfLqY1SF0vx63/n6/
 0j+oX5gUIkAm3sR7gqBOTFQP89b4ULkWwINosNkHPhEMzKee5B4k7aRFGxLW+uD+mBZu
 vF8g1LivMTsgkfmZCWIcJB6nOkSV+T+kmsHwoC/b2dsWC35pARY06/A1m56Jaq/UnGOz
 IGrqKQn5gNQDH2Be8vp5NB/iez9gUxpFiJyfXFPYibgv5nrB5sv7KdVuS77Q3QWXlFdF
 /D/odvpyPVL2Mo5CxYRkdtDrhFVKHFz+s1iCvOcMMnUzYe6WI/Iw4aMAKUTAF0wR4Nrk
 Oqfg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora8vSPgZ9ZS18TtFJZsaa99Es3prs94flpVS1tDlWP9bi80rFr6g
 ITEFg6dAb88TsQ3I+TrVFyp07rqJ2j+7ZFFU0EA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1um0YKcOlAYDmA2CtSgRDg+nVl1GHN8zA63Ka0Ee31b4ux39AExEClrQvbhmGuxxr7gbLYxVkNipYI6rU2kikA=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1847:b0:218:4336:5590 with SMTP id
 c7-20020a056000184700b0021843365590mr4574988wri.511.1655209297313; Tue, 14
 Jun 2022 05:21:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAEYL+X83mWrc7ObRyrt1iQREgMViMQPXZbHwup4P_4i=EgOogA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEYL+X83mWrc7ObRyrt1iQREgMViMQPXZbHwup4P_4i=EgOogA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 13:21:26 +0100
Message-ID: <CAH6eHdR0UesVU7eWWuTuDgeW4B4_sPaFChvj2_yXJmUzqQ9o+A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: std::format support?
To: Zopolis0 <creatorsmithmdt@gmail.com>
Cc: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
 SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc mailing list <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc>,
 <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc>,
 <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 12:21:40 -0000

On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 at 13:15, Zopolis0 via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> There was some discussion around std::format support 2 years ago, with
> people suggesting to just use the fmt code, and others suggesting that an
> independent implementation might be of higher quality.

No, that's not what I said.

> 2 years have since
> passed, and we have no implementation, of higher or identical quality.
> Could we come to a decision on this? Having no implementation whatsoever is
> the worst possible outcome.

What good would a decision be? Somebody still has to do the actual
work to add it.

If you want a decision, here you go: we're going to reimplement it for
libstdc++. Happy now?