From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-x42d.google.com (mail-wr1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42d]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BE183858D20 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 12:55:25 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 9BE183858D20 Received: by mail-wr1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id u1so18203915wrg.11 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 04:55:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tRJ2l3V4Sq+YI2D+hyy2/RGQ+KP+jteZmrl081mAq+4=; b=gCWi8f0oxqxOlz6zLkGbGvgSSe7NEGWItULQp7ZmE538NssWjJ2K2unL5srInKjyzH qQxvzl5KJ8yBHjvpnZItJC3u5Gt5WT83jwcjiMDRiwEUzypUojh6UrsmXZige/EllgQY TCfJ3kBePpufZmEL8IT3k3MzKOjEucerzPJwZm0n62DN1Wetc7YAa78095p4eVWQQ9f+ kdsy8GnslAs0CdesJ+48GCwqV6PreobvX4vfM3f3mafD1rJF1j7phtWpjNBS5hmWgGxz qJR+Ail+K6raf2XpaUvc26IebcNNgdn9aQRv3OOILgHshxrANoPjr73A8qaxpZOW/Uiw y+3Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531iShzRY9kt3v+Zw3nNmNMyd/AbjitmXAWy8S/7/yMk5X+cm/ex 0uYybBBcvBfsbDNZGKxOt8vDJA9yaXlOzhH9e0I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz1PvHlZahp3TBcG9IvNmhFG8x37JnmCO4zGSlchH9zmaFXJr9tFI4KiVHhqnFqaVEijYhKT9JFxNaJ+U4f7Ls= X-Received: by 2002:adf:d4cb:: with SMTP id w11mr3117687wrk.221.1644929724351; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 04:55:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Jonathan Wakely Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 12:55:12 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Request easy bug fix To: Baruch Burstein Cc: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, KAM_SHORT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 12:55:27 -0000 On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 at 12:34, Baruch Burstein via Gcc wrote: > Hi, > > I hope it is not inappropriate to call attention to a specific bug. > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla//show_bug.cgi?id=85487. > I tried to do it myself, but got lost on the part where I needed to > compile gcc 3 times and compare test results to some (un)known test > results. You compare the test results of your patched gcc to the test results of an unpatched gcc. How did you get lost? To "compile gcc 3 times" you just run "make", and it does that automatically (unless you configured with --disable-bootstrap, in which case it just compiles once). > It was too much time and setup for a fix that will probably > take 2 minutes to implement, so I am asking if someone that already > contributes to gcc can please look at this. I think it should only > take a couple of minutes to implement. > No change ever takes two minutes, because you have to write tests at a minimum.