From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-x32f.google.com (mail-wm1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2608B3896813 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 14:28:11 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 2608B3896813 Received: by mail-wm1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id a132so13770798wmc.0 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 06:28:11 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VH6WG26+d1rYq30U34o7aKSPF5PAMQ4Q8LZid57te5g=; b=Ae+/EMw2RtkAG2tZ3LMmcBavpT0mVR+1jYCQ7TtAEw5krk60o/52Ru73GGYWMvyp9x H9lBMwIlcII5BtSZp1wXJE1VLUqugTHGjTREbP3PRGdFhLJ+OfUZoepeT6y3OjHiMJA9 vd7QOnQubDEXGSs2Hj9G17L1Q9Lt/MOoOJaqyEOl4xuQ5ZejRmfFpMtuC/Grci5Ecbmn KIL8/ogkWxQoRTE/1C2ai76ucOeH+aE1NYjPEsQDuXLR7rpGo43Y9NYYpid7mWI+Uxz7 zg3n9CiKhdAUYObe7LETkDgTd8ZBXTB7jyLVrHImXAZMbqt+EOO0M8EGNB/FZiW41lu1 IXNA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533hgtRjtYyhY3pZbTCFWCOM+KD54Sh7APBA6SO9zcpLklIovm2/ Xjp0QMiiX5+F0E2X66LeaxfbNrBME8Ww7sCreEs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwHIN510Ezyeidvugb2uLEcT1GzwGFhdybS/5PogAzE4PK1KAFQe3DKILDxYeUdwzIAHO7ukO/4qejchOl1R4A= X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cb4f:: with SMTP id v15mr20569606wmj.162.1614004090260; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 06:28:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Jonathan Wakely Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 14:27:59 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Doc fix request: C/C++ extended asm empty input constraint To: Neven Sajko Cc: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_SHORT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 14:28:12 -0000 On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 at 02:17, Neven Sajko wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 at 08:11, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, 15 Feb 2021, 00:48 Neven Sajko via Gcc, wrote: > >> > >> > >> This is why I am asking for this feature to be documented. It seems > >> like this would be the most appropriate place: > >> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-Asm.html#InputOperands > >> > >> I would have tried to contribute a doc fix myself, but I couldn't find > >> the sources for the online docs in the GCC Git repository. > > > > > > > > git grep is your friend. The relevant section is: > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blob;f=gcc/doc/extend.texi;h=e110cb010617bfb78e740433c3aa30a7399b504e;hb=HEAD#l10344 > > I posted a patch back then (a week ago) to gcc-patches, but there was > no response. I'm not complaining, but I wonder if I should maybe ping > a developer interested in the extended asm extension specifically? Who > might that be? I don't think there is a maintainer for asm statements, but a docs maintainer might be relevant for this patch. You can also just ping the patch by replying to it on the list, without CCing anybody particular. > This is the patch in the archive: > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-February/565339.html I replied to the mail.