From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-173961-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 6355 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2012 11:41:51 -0000
Received: (qmail 6346 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Apr 2012 11:41:50 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-lb0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-lb0-f175.google.com) (209.85.217.175)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 11:41:37 +0000
Received: by lbbgk1 with SMTP id gk1so438405lbb.20        for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 04:41:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.103.74 with SMTP id fu10mr2242252lbb.1.1334403696352; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 04:41:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.85.98 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 04:41:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAPOVtOu0F7ZOuLu8Pz-0iKw3nNKAZ+wHfJbXy4W8=NNaejO+eQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4F7B356E.9080003@google.com>	<CAGWvnymDHXtN1AR9hdrYpV7UVw-rkk5ZiM0kS9DbVLY24xQ-6Q@mail.gmail.com>	<CAAiZkiA29bnrEHg3jHyOtmdFo1HewaW-rp3KYOKC+gfEQ1pXzA@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFiYyc0wG3ha4B4BgA6g4NPnBG6Pj3iuMZ+_B+3AOgBkKvXpLg@mail.gmail.com>	<4F7C2E74.6010501@google.com>	<CAFiYyc28MbQ9ggMNZCw8a49i8KKVmmu1zr_9cwChGn84cqXL+w@mail.gmail.com>	<CAPOVtOs8kxye6NL26ayEWcD-Ex3XMfX=dP3yX7BZFgVrwEog9A@mail.gmail.com>	<4F893ECA.6070004@adacore.com>	<CAPOVtOu0F7ZOuLu8Pz-0iKw3nNKAZ+wHfJbXy4W8=NNaejO+eQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 11:41:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAH6eHdRaox5r7VjqE-MyO9RUGF28GVMcB8uD7iJii49z2UMD2g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Switching to C++ by default in 4.8
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
To: Chiheng Xu <chiheng.xu@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Dewar <dewar@adacore.com>, Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>, 	Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com>, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>, 	David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>, gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00638.txt.bz2

On 14 April 2012 11:02, Chiheng Xu wrote:
>
> If debugger fully support namespace, that will be nice. I just say,
> in case debugger have trouble with namespace, you can avoid it.

So it's completely unfounded speculation then.

> But personally, when I write C++ code, I never use namespace. =A0I
> always prefix my class name(and corresponding source file names) with
> proper module name, and put the all source files of a module in its
> dedicated sub-directory . =A0This make class name globally unique
> throughout the project, and facilitate further re-factoring(searching
> and replacing).

Find'n'replace is not refactoring.