From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-173516-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 26768 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2012 14:00:38 -0000
Received: (qmail 26756 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Apr 2012 14:00:37 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f47.google.com (HELO mail-lpp01m010-f47.google.com) (209.85.215.47)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:00:21 +0000
Received: by lagw12 with SMTP id w12so1752914lag.20        for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 07:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.131.66 with SMTP id ok2mr3219097lab.10.1333634419591; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 07:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.85.98 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 07:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120405101630.GA9348@adacore.com>
References: <CAAiZkiDuX94Qf3-1EONGVnxX4nsxhdHLemg9kSZRVVaarTQ-OA@mail.gmail.com>	<4F7D5EB4.2060903@redhat.com>	<CAAiZkiDJ_iB46Q36FQePcfyx7D35OBpdQNKmg9kCTyWMH09SqA@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFiYyc25PLAuc-RL7zYqUwBsjQ6kbpVh0FSCEQcVGukYDSkEhg@mail.gmail.com>	<CAAiZkiC_4PqK7YV0yPTijO6t0C2RBVG0PVQDetndwL+M6pdqYQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFiYyc0Lj99FPpAYEmt76o4yS7p9J4A+x1J9Pz=7uPVMEUtJmg@mail.gmail.com>	<CAAiZkiAgWExkammLDS3QPpk07Z+Xsv3nC0AbktY-LMejOtHakg@mail.gmail.com>	<20120405100409.GA5596@adacore.com>	<CAAiZkiA9K=-Yx4GQn9k8V6C0uxZTk97zCV9T9pFxB9Fu=P2R_A@mail.gmail.com>	<20120405101630.GA9348@adacore.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:00:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAH6eHdReyK-bzN59QF0szSrKgtpnS7bG3mJaGdjG90LBH6Xs4g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: -Wall by default
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
To: Arnaud Charlet <charlet@adacore.com>
Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>, 	Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>, gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00193.txt.bz2

On 5 April 2012 11:16, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
>
> OK, the above list looks reasonable to me at least as a starting point
> that could be a bit refined (not sure -Wstrict-aliasing is so useful by
> default for instance for legacy code),

-Wstrict-aliasing is only active when -fstrict-aliasing is on, and if
that's on the warning definitely should be, since it indicates code
that may well misbehave, "legacy" or not.