From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2348 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2011 08:35:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 2258 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Jul 2011 08:35:36 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (HELO mail-pz0-f44.google.com) (209.85.210.44) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 08:35:22 +0000 Received: by pzk5 with SMTP id 5so7629430pzk.17 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 01:35:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.90.14 with SMTP id s14mr4081714wfl.138.1311150921196; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 01:35:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.103.17 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 01:35:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:34:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: PATCH RFA: Build stages 2 and 3 with C++ From: Jonathan Wakely To: David Edelsohn Cc: Ian Lance Taylor , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00372.txt.bz2 On 20 July 2011 02:14, David Edelsohn wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > >> I got agreement from two global reviewers and no objections. >> >> I have committed this patch. >> >> Please let me know about any problems. > > This also breaks bootstrap on AIX. =A0I cannot debug further at the > moment because of a separate problem with the infrastructure at IBM, > but I receive the following error during the first build of libstdc++: > > In file included from /farm/dje/src/src/libstdc++-v3/src/debug.cc:30:0: > /tmp/20110719/powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/safe_loca= l_iterator.h:91:50: > error: 'size_t' has not been declared Hmm, that should possibly be using std::size_t instead. We ensure std::size_t has been declared by the library, but not necessarily ::size_t