From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13852 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2013 01:18:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13843 invoked by uid 89); 20 Dec 2013 01:18:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-ig0-f175.google.com Received: from mail-ig0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-ig0-f175.google.com) (209.85.213.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 01:18:24 +0000 Received: by mail-ig0-f175.google.com with SMTP id j1so13658242iga.2 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 17:18:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.17.100 with SMTP id n4mr5166979igd.11.1387502302560; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 17:18:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.98.34 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 17:18:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1387501934.4681.6.camel@surprise> References: <1387501934.4681.6.camel@surprise> Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 01:18:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Remove spam in GCC mailing list From: Jonathan Wakely To: David Malcolm Cc: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-12/txt/msg00200.txt.bz2 On 20 December 2013 01:12, David Malcolm wrote: > On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 00:04 +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> On 19 December 2013 23:15, Tae Wong wrote: >> > More spam posts to be removed! >> >> Using an email address with "seo" in it makes you look like a spammer. >> >> Posting links to spam makes you look like a spammer. >> >> Posting meaningless crap about mozilla bugzilla permissions and >> wine-devel makes you look like a bot. >> >> Can we ban this sender? > > Agreed, FWIW see also: > https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-December/130727.html The motivation seems obvious to me: create archived links to the spam posts, giving them higher page rank. We should find him and kneecap him, or if that's not possible ban him from the list.