On Mon, 28 Nov 2022, 08:08 Jan Beulich via Gcc, <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:

> On 26.11.2022 20:04, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Monday 21 November 2022 08:24:36 Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> But then, with you replying to
> >> me specifically, perhaps you're wrongly assuming that I would be
> >> planning to look into addressing any or all of these? My earlier reply
> >> was merely to point out that _some_ work has already been done ...
> >
> > I added into CC also gcc, ld and mingw mailing list. If this is not
> > enough, could you tell me who to contact about those issues?
>
> That's probably enough, sure. I merely tried to set expectations right,
> since you did reply To: me (and lists were only on Cc: - it being the
> other way around would have demonstrated that you're not asking me
> specifically).
>

That's just how most mailers do "Reply All", I don't think it out implies
anything. Removing the Cc list and *only* replying to you would be
different.