From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=xvsq=34=gmail.com=jwakely.gcc@sourceware.org>
Received: from mail-ed1-x530.google.com (mail-ed1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::530])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12B0D385B181
	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 08:40:48 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 12B0D385B181
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com
Received: by mail-ed1-x530.google.com with SMTP id s5so14375483edc.12
        for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 00:40:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
        h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=yLre9hXCOJJlBM3wWVfcRSFZl6vMgthLPHASScKyVE8=;
        b=gONtwXz0x2J42S0RzI+x+RGaCtdS2xlAn2KG/1jvZ2vRvlwyVA99Fj+3I0kU2GLTX9
         Mice5PZKfnukT2Sg8erRmylr/UqdIHT6EHLIPG7RTZpoxfDvSZ3nKEQT303kOsh/vEf1
         ge/PfHnO2iZzPJexW9EDKtceiUmUfx/z8AmAQzLPp5aiOXtBd6Wdpxw2SjWGarC/2t2v
         7eo22hirFW+DWQ937Wjn2RtT+VPFhVeRJ8LrStrNk1PjBpkpX3flwnLcyFSjO7OLSH11
         hJ8B5VHoKYS0if09h77u3jzcqjXiztNM2+H5piwAFYhIt+XGXuqllOLMvPd+Yk+jLWxP
         yFGg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
        h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
         :reply-to;
        bh=yLre9hXCOJJlBM3wWVfcRSFZl6vMgthLPHASScKyVE8=;
        b=kmAHYd7hWsLXwIZaRUdi9IRmfF9E1Qm0NFLGUdXtdnjyul31l5/VTSuKt3FG9CsYlT
         wSGrGoLLgd87xx8mwSSReOPNHz506pv2DW9295PVuZUcq5u401u7+NG2iPLrKc+E7HM/
         JDfIFNyHd5YoNxR4+Ibn4/K2atIWGS8dqO61yJOZ3pSDr5K3u8K3Wv9X5TykpdkqTsV3
         oib9e94azlQqFSNa+Aw5xA8oBuiDQ8C4A+mEsFmvD1MRMnrpP+H0OEw29A4wVN7qC86j
         44SLHohU2oXqp1tDIsB6lt+ulYft5JW4GtD6x6ZA6GDc4T9rjCUM5qtFVu46f351hk9J
         SwPQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pn/4pYfceD5/jsBj48srNYpVTHtetJUVjDfQtSToQkd7VUWEaRF
	Fwbj2Jf/TvBDNKwHa0Le6/FSEwcnJXwr8FAh1zk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf40zZzhcKnaRo0uwQ/sxBEjlj5868dvLu1v2D8UN//1RccQBaV04nvtT+hf27TNlRCwkRuUF89jYbbLFMsrbu0=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:24a1:b0:463:e963:5149 with SMTP id
 q33-20020a05640224a100b00463e9635149mr46034180eda.219.1669624846744; Mon, 28
 Nov 2022 00:40:46 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20221030000611.ytfadi4f2xcvodey@pali> <9c878a09-fd84-325c-771a-65d88aff7282@suse.com>
 <20221105005749.3ultigucvhqoikvx@pali> <20221105012652.e4x5xm7lhrd4rgbn@pali>
 <20221120131057.mwk4nkl53vs4nygo@pali> <f20deff9-9cd1-3742-070f-0075d32b6b88@suse.com>
 <20221126190445.z6kfhqkeesusmuae@pali> <ed50b32a-3bfd-3f3f-1cdf-d2de140697be@suse.com>
In-Reply-To: <ed50b32a-3bfd-3f3f-1cdf-d2de140697be@suse.com>
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 08:40:34 +0000
Message-ID: <CAH6eHdS0JpyzepPxH6oM+4_hfcLanzh8J58uvz85xOZvrpbAYA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Problems when building NT kernel drivers with GCC / LD
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Pali_Roh=C3=A1r?= <pali.rohar@gmail.com>, 
	Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>, "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>, 
	MinGW-64 Mailinglist <mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e602b005ee83d313"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>

--000000000000e602b005ee83d313
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 28 Nov 2022, 08:08 Jan Beulich via Gcc, <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:

> On 26.11.2022 20:04, Pali Roh=C3=A1r wrote:
> > On Monday 21 November 2022 08:24:36 Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> But then, with you replying to
> >> me specifically, perhaps you're wrongly assuming that I would be
> >> planning to look into addressing any or all of these? My earlier reply
> >> was merely to point out that _some_ work has already been done ...
> >
> > I added into CC also gcc, ld and mingw mailing list. If this is not
> > enough, could you tell me who to contact about those issues?
>
> That's probably enough, sure. I merely tried to set expectations right,
> since you did reply To: me (and lists were only on Cc: - it being the
> other way around would have demonstrated that you're not asking me
> specifically).
>

That's just how most mailers do "Reply All", I don't think it out implies
anything. Removing the Cc list and *only* replying to you would be
different.

--000000000000e602b005ee83d313--