From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 103267 invoked by alias); 19 Jun 2019 19:07:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 103259 invoked by uid 89); 19 Jun 2019 19:07:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*f:sk:yXYc4PL, H*i:sk:CAF9ehC, H*f:sk:CAF9ehC, H*i:sk:yXYc4PL X-HELO: mail-wm1-f42.google.com Received: from mail-wm1-f42.google.com (HELO mail-wm1-f42.google.com) (209.85.128.42) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 19:07:54 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-f42.google.com with SMTP id v19so606419wmj.5 for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 12:07:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=eC7iNCZtcX3W7g0KhZbfCqc8pCWP/z2J8NX3DTmTh+8=; b=P5h3HhkabtL0cqLvDJwAbzFv3LBe+7DBhSFrlrkze9sEFQn6u1r6I1R4q3nnXNArUc WfdMsYd+KDnbo1KRssQZAepmUJz1BUbwRl+vtZvyjM0u/dgVXCaWaoLwQnIFY8QEP05b Pz3y2eCZBuDxhakd+TjxeVX5JPgBAsrWXS4RmTP14PiokrXk5MyvqAyYm37aZgKxXvk2 3W2/yTk7RvQs6xWFWNT5qOo0MW0aCcfxEufzlFOhCtzD6CgK9KTvb0mViWRsOS2IK+XL pHFu+LWyfZrP+81rIyuvTWirS53hAfSij4iVHhq/+xTVb4xv1VsEN/D9eHVPCurtFjW5 fWfQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Jonathan Wakely Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 19:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: C++17 Support and Website To: Joel Sherrill Cc: GCC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-06/txt/msg00198.txt.bz2 On Wed, 19 Jun 2019 at 20:05, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > Hi > > I was double checking the C++17 support in GCC for someone and the text at > this URL states > the support is experimental and gives the impression that the support is > incomplete. The table > of language features now has them all implemented. > > Is this text still accurate? No, see the 9.1.0 announcement: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-announce/2019/msg00001.html > https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html#cxx17 We should fix that, thanks!