From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-x32b.google.com (mail-wm1-x32b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32b]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3D41385828A for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 15:54:39 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org F3D41385828A Received: by mail-wm1-x32b.google.com with SMTP id q15so3219311wmj.2 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 08:54:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=y4YnuPygvp41SxwjvalbXfk2m/MTJ88Ya44Aq7WRcoU=; b=k1Wa0j3Kj+P1Ypb25AvA+lKFYDuqhX2bJq3jjiX4BSBinU7URojIQ4gC2CPHxejp2c fIPrbx0gLs/THJoucOZPoBP5lwiakSoe7fnWfWFWkR6ofFmRvdCEIN4ZL+beiVprAYdS MkG92NyNXrGs+xLWl1YQTdEJbvpcXz8Xg7aCEnbUpHGqepNnwXnhitZyE3BdRSbpHXBJ LHMnV7Cuy+E7nbAfjXl0vQyjqkXdissnjpL+ORvOBNrXXY/bxX4LoS41WUwc7HA9RHsR 8mn18Xv7xEAM9xZOfYrvmcZ5JOxXxpn6GIZDrZnMtmsJ3xni227MN5lQUU9SPQQfMc/6 Tgfg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532XNHUZeLf/9Z1ptzLQdSPMPMj6KYwfBeg3T9mKoewGenP6o+ZU so6bxc222D9EDH0Xhu7upGfdbFcLpRK27B2uTFc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwyX1DDAGB1axRjtcx5H0bSaEqG91T5cLCiR1ARvVgsBsA0q8LiMQ95D155xEigQlbr2691QX8w+VOEEbSy4Q8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3505:b0:39c:93d4:5eec with SMTP id h5-20020a05600c350500b0039c93d45eecmr120745wmq.179.1655135678675; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 08:54:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <520a1013-ec4a-b3ca-871b-5e8110f61d37@gmail.com> <02b74788-43b3-da53-8f3b-3b114329f8d6@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Jonathan Wakely Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 16:54:27 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [C2x] Disallow function attributes after function identifier To: Alejandro Colomar Cc: Gabriel Ravier , Jakub Jelinek , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" , Joseph Myers Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 15:54:42 -0000 On Sat, 11 Jun 2022 at 21:17, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > P.S.: Please consider deprecating 'auto' some day. It would be nice to > see C++'s auto in ISO C some day, even if it's 2060. I'm not entirely > happy doing `#define auto __auto_type` (of course it's UB, but it's nice) ;) There's a proposal, but it leaves it open whether to standardize it as "auto" or "__auto_type". https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2953.htm