From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-x433.google.com (mail-wr1-x433.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::433]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 914FF38A940B; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 18:24:03 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 914FF38A940B Received: by mail-wr1-x433.google.com with SMTP id o3so34596091wrh.10; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 10:24:03 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KyVnahwQK2WN/rlBGm+t2JDrXwporgSFRUzkttq65uo=; b=Y9BK06C2Ym9jfVzWbsUwawThOevFhFly5UgjYD64qiKbCgTKZ/CwLd7ZlI7ERHgWHB nF8G0SDY61GFYF9bcvwLfdu/CLj4AD83GrShV6NEKpL04uoDxRGCjaFlcb9tVEBEpQp6 INM4XG8bj7OWRafeQW0MdvlrXIGxDTw6dodtuUzrBONLZB3p2a7Kw0WoFamp3RLOOYDF modRGzahqboHunfv50KTkYT3Anlpkygsn6yEddXAU+5GhQSRcR5CgSHsnAe9pFTjRzBU OW+vgTilI+IF6KifEqKiXqmGhR5ENkjIMVZfwOlMHkoezVIguZatUk4WKm+NpYO7/K0W ZQ9g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530rKK3oYsBF9HD2MwxdeRlKjH8BN2MvBq1iFbKTkGbmLlx8xYUY FHYUR07EPS84alrMzB+vP4MksGitkVHRuyuHeWU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzRjtc1n7p+NM4o48jN/sf0bnvXyM0PqWF01/nOKE1nsvKljKpeRQifUmRj6EA+ZNBhEwfi+ckBdSjK8tuZSOI= X-Received: by 2002:adf:fa08:: with SMTP id m8mr4876556wrr.221.1641925442701; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 10:24:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <57564370-7184-ef62-039e-60b150058fd8@suse.cz> <68946bf6-4b2f-b8f3-20b3-5cf3f2fd611c@moene.org> <713a96b5-b82e-ffd7-d03b-7e05a4dede9e@suse.cz> In-Reply-To: From: Jonathan Wakely Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 18:23:51 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Mass rename of C++ .c files to .cc suffix To: Harald Anlauf Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=C5=A1ka?= , Toon Moene , Martin Jambor , GCC Mailing List , GCC Patches , gfortran Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 18:24:04 -0000 On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 at 18:02, Harald Anlauf via Gcc wrote= : > > Am 11.01.22 um 16:50 schrieb Martin Li=C5=A1ka: > > On 1/11/22 16:48, Toon Moene wrote: > >> On 1/11/22 13:56, Martin Li=C5=A1ka wrote: > >> > >>> Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests= . > >>> Plus it survives build of all FEs (--enable-languages=3Dall) on > >>> x86_64-linux-gnu > >>> and I've built all cross compilers. > >> > >> Does this also rename .c files in the fortran and libgfortran > >> directories ? > > > > Hello. > > > > Yes, it does the first one. > > Regarding fortran: can we have a vote on this one? > > Some developers (including myself) are not really familiar with C++, > and in the past preference has been expressed on the fortran ML in > favor of not using too much C++. > > I would also not really be in a position to review real C++ code. The discussion is purely about renaming files that are *already* C++ source files but have the misleading .c file extension. Nobody is suggesting using C++ where it isn't already being used.