From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wm1-x329.google.com (mail-wm1-x329.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::329])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59F193857812
 for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu,  1 Apr 2021 20:31:42 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 59F193857812
Received: by mail-wm1-x329.google.com with SMTP id
 n11-20020a05600c4f8bb029010e5cf86347so4396479wmq.1
 for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 13:31:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=S5h5J/lo7/wN6dqSiG9j9ssuowF64B7zNHVU1GvLc7Q=;
 b=qT/VY4II17mG68qKQRwWVZpQpDxMRrxTrterOpdcUC4P5mlVoE/7YmBG64Rvqpfis5
 escN8/KfsSiVW4kfQJAn9t2d7QytvXwgUaZAL56m7y9YEI3JfKbpi/tVHDyAAXjjQwz3
 P0kffr0h++9Mk4xRot5P7hzVQXoNFwn7Isra9WssO1U1J6dbvZBgrFZ5aNsh5Q2HguV+
 NCAXmPptXiGaTxRhX/QLidCGPiuLIpjJ1P6ZJTaFSSmpNtFio5s2ekmMEkMjo0BgudNM
 t8WQNmm0NY0cZ85B8Rxv3SLitXuu+gwa6hzO8bOuhvceT10FKUXqCD7ZcxVH5aAe4AlC
 4FJg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531438cYO/LMIhGTt7g4sFuhu3x/v49K0t011vouyiBOCx02aZ0/
 49/LuSMCI7L6dWnT6EpomwwdM+YGH0KzpD4YF0c=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwf81t8d8sMRyFtRtxRrLcNpIO/X6br2B04ycX9xWS1v2swekiNYvCigvqrfX3d/VgW9QRJo2JEqNmqczJIqBM=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3647:: with SMTP id
 y7mr9764603wmq.17.1617309100479; 
 Thu, 01 Apr 2021 13:31:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.2104011433080.17979@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>
 <2252950.NG923GbCHz@fomalhaut> <5AE0E9ED-FA42-41F4-93B4-649564860898@suse.de>
 <11016E6E-F904-4585-81BF-28DFCC8C6377@googlemail.com>
 <CAH6eHdThSxit=ACbxgFEG-oLRDq1=wr8sRoKnaeaXK9vVEj-1w@mail.gmail.com>
 <A67D057D-5187-4A21-B38E-36F7D2AFA293@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <A67D057D-5187-4A21-B38E-36F7D2AFA293@gmail.com>
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 21:31:29 +0100
Message-ID: <CAH6eHdSyGNAsJCg5mEWGm7GjPit-MRyj4TbT7pyzV_Bq9m1ufw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: GCC 10.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
To: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Cc: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>,
 Iain Sandoe <idsandoe@googlemail.com>, 
 Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_SHORT,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc mailing list <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc>,
 <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc>,
 <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 20:31:43 -0000

On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 at 21:08, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On April 1, 2021 9:49:19 PM GMT+02:00, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 at 20:23, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> >>
> >> Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On April 1, 2021 4:08:21 PM GMT+02:00, Eric Botcazou
> >> > <botcazou@adacore.com> wrote:
> >> >>> I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate on
> >> >>> x86_64-linux.  Please test it and report any issues to bugzilla.
> >>
> >> On x86 Darwin, a lot of new libstdc++ experimental/filesystem fails.
> >>
> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99875
> >
> >I missed a backport, this is needed for gcc-10 branch:
> >https://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gcc-gitref.cgi?r=r11-7239
> >Only affects the testsuite, but in a util header that is used by lots
> >of tests.
> >
> >I'll wait for RM approval before pushing the backport.
>
> This is OK.

Pushed, thanks.